反垄断法中的宽大制度与信息保密问题研究  

Research on Leniency System and Information Secrecy in Antitrust Law

作　　者：綦书纬[1,2] 李洁 

机构地区：[1]山东政法学院 [2]山东政法学院竞争法治研究院 [3]中国化学工程第七建设有限公司法律和风险管理部

出　　处：《价格理论与实践》2019年第3期27-32,175,共7页Price:Theory & Practice

基　　金：济南市人大常委会委托立法项目《经济法规清理研究》(项目编号:2018F19B);山东政法学院科研发展计划项目《公平竞争审查制度实施研究》(项目编号:2017F06B)的阶段性成果

摘　　要：横向垄断协议行为被世界各个反垄断司法辖区列为重点打击的对象。为了提高发现和查处横向垄断协议行为的几率,众多司法辖区先后效仿美国引入了宽大制度。宽大制度以博弈论中的"囚徒困境"理论为基础,吸引横向垄断协议的参与者积极寻求与反垄断执法机构合作。引入宽大制度的司法辖区通常都对宽大申请资料采取了保密措施,但却鲜有对宽大申请被接受者身份信息保密采取措施者。宽大申请被接受者以"出卖盟友"为代价换取免除或者减轻自己所应承担的金钱责任或者刑事责任,但却同时面临"告密者"身份信息被曝光而利益受损的风险。我国在完善宽大制度或者制定宽大制度相关指南的过程中,可借鉴我国台湾地区的做法,赋予宽大申请被接受者身份信息保密的申请权。The horizontal monopoly agreements has been listed as the main target of anti-monopoly jurisdictions in the world. Many jurisdictions have introduced a leniency system to discover and investigat acts of horizontal monopoly agreements. Based on the "Prisoner’s Dilemma" theory in game theory, the lenient systemand attracts participants to seek cooperation with anti-monopoly law enforcement agencies. The jurisdictions usually adopt confidentiality measures for the lenient application materials, but few take measures to keep the identity of the lenient application.The lenient application recipients exchange "selling allies" for exemption or mitigation of their monetary or criminal liability, but face the risk that the "whistleblower" identity information is exposed. China can learn from the practice of Taiwan that grant the right of application to perfectthe leniency system or formulating guidelines for leniency.

关 键 词：反垄断 横向垄断协议 宽大制度 信息保密 信息公开 

分 类 号：D912.29[政治法律—民商法学]