家事犯罪理论的初步构设——基于家庭安全的需要  

Theoretical Construction of Cognate Offences ——Based on Family Security

作　　者：张训[1] Zhang Xun(Institute of Political Science and Law,Huaibei Normal University,Huaibei Anhui 235000)

机构地区：[1]淮北师范大学政法学院

出　　处：《河南财经政法大学学报》2019年第4期97-109,共13页Journal of Henan University of Economics and Law

基　　金：安徽省哲学社会科学规划一般项目“刑事错案中的被害人问题研究”(项目编号:AHSKY2017D91)的阶段性成果之一

摘　　要：很多犯罪是通过对家庭安全造成危害从而给社会制造危害的。家庭犯罪成为刑法及刑法理论需要顾及的重要部分。家事犯罪和国事犯罪存在逻辑上的关联。在漫长的传统宗法社会中,家事犯罪因为与国事犯罪之间相互关联使得二者在刑制上几乎一样严厉。通过对古今亲属相奸、亲属相盗等几种典型家事犯罪的立法体例与案例的比较分析得知,现代刑制与传统刑制之间既有融通也有相悖之处。面对家事犯罪,现代刑法应当从传统刑制的影响中抽身出来,既要防止家长权对刑罚权的挤占,也要谨防刑法轻易踏入家门,从而对家庭伦理秩序造成冲击,使得家庭关系难以修复。Many crimes do harm to society by endangering family security.The theory of criminal law and criminal law should give the cognate offences adequate attention.There is a logical connection between the state offences and cognate offences.In patriarchal society,they were almost the same in the criminal law system.By comparing it with instance of legislation and case crime among the relatives,we find,the modern criminal law system and the traditional criminal law system have their similarities as well as differences.For cognate offences,the modern criminal law paternity is necessary to prevent the abuse of the right of punishment by the patriarchy,and also to prevent the criminal law from interfering with family affairs easily.Otherwise,it may destroy family order.

关 键 词：家庭安全 国事犯罪 家事犯罪 案例研判 刑法去向 

分 类 号：D924[政治法律—刑法学]