ICSID仲裁庭应对东道国腐败抗辩的困境及其解决——以仲裁庭对涉腐投资主张无管辖权为切入点  

On the Difficulties of ICSID Tribunals’ Dealing with Host State’s Corruption Defense and the Solutions——Taking Tribunals’ Denial of Jurisdiction as the Cut-Point

作　　者：银红武[1] YIN Hongwu

机构地区：[1]湖南师范大学法学院

出　　处：《湖南师范大学社会科学学报》2019年第4期73-82,共10页Journal of Social Science of Hunan Normal University

基　　金：2018年湖南省高校创新平台开放基金项目“国际投资仲裁‘程序滥用’及其规制研究”(18K022);2019年度湖南省社会科学成果评审委员会课题“‘一带一路’倡议下中非双边投资条约的革新研究”(XSP19YBZ178);长沙市涉外法律服务研究中心“国际商事合规与反腐法律问题研究”项目

摘　　要：近些年来,腐败问题已经在国际投资法的研究与实践中日益引起重视.ICSID仲裁庭在一些涉及腐败的国际投资争端案中对东道国的腐败抗辩予以了审慎考虑并做出了相应裁决,但部分裁决法理饱受诟病,特别是在仲裁庭判定自身对涉腐国际投资没有管辖权的裁决推理上.ICSID仲裁庭应依法行使管辖权并对腐败行为进行本质剖析、甄别,在庭审过程中坚持采纳衡平路径,对争端各方的责、权、利进行均衡考量.现实表明,有必要加强ICSID仲裁程序与内国国际投资反腐败机制间的协作互动.Corruption issue attracts more and more attention in international investment law study and practice during the recent years. After taking prudent consideration of corruption defense invoked by the host states in some international investment arbitration cases involved with corruption problem,ICSID tribunals made the final awards accordingly. But some part of the arbitral jurisprudence incurred strong criticism especially of the ICSID tribunals' reasoning that arbitrators have no jurisdiction over corrupt international investments. The ICSID tribunals are lawfully supposed to exercise the jurisdiction and probe into the nature of corrupt activities. The tribunals are strongly proposed to adopt the balancing approach in deciding the cases and weigh up fairly the obligation , right and interest between the disputing parties. It is strongly proposed to strengthen the collaborative interaction between ICSID proceedings and domestic mechanism of combating against the corruption activities in international investments.

关 键 词：腐败抗辩 仲裁管辖权 衡平路径 协作互动 

分 类 号：D997.9[政治法律—刑法学]