汉字类型理论研究略论——从“六书说”、“三书说”到“新六书说”  

A Brief View on the Study of Chinese Character Type Theory——From “Six Types Theory”, “Three Types Theory” to “New Six Types Theory”

作　　者：巴哲 罗娜 BA Zhe;LUO Na(Research Center of Ancient Chinese Calligraphy and Painting, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou Zhejiang 310058,China;Pingxiang Museum, Pingxiang Jiangxi 337000,China)

机构地区：[1]浙江大学中国古代书画研究中心,浙江杭州310058 [2]萍乡博物馆,江西萍乡337000

出　　处：《萍乡学院学报》2019年第2期82-85,共4页Journal of Pingxiang University

摘　　要：随着文字研究的深入,对汉字结构类型的分析也在不断地发展和完善。从传统"六书说"到"三书说",再到"新六书说"以及其他诸家理论,学者们从不同的角度对汉字进行分析,力图用新的理论框架来概括汉字的类型,争取做到逻辑更严密、系统性更强。文章拟选取以下几个代表性观点:"六书说",唐兰、陈梦家、裘锡圭等的"三书说"以及詹鄞鑫的"新六书说",通过分别评述各家理论的内容,来分析这几种理论的分类标准及其不足。With the deepening of the study of Chinese characters, the analysis of the structure of Chinese characters is also constantly developing and improving. From the traditional "Six Types Theory" to "Three Types Theory", and then to "New Six Types Theory" and other theories, scholars have analyzed Chinese characters from different perspectives, trying to generalize the types of Chinese characters with a new theoretical framework, in order to create a more logical and systematic theory. The paper intends to select the following representative viewpoints:"Six Types Theory","Three Types Theory" of TANG Lan, CHEN Meng-jia, QIU Xi-gui and "New Six Types Theory" of ZHAN Yin-xin. By reviewing the contents of each theory, the classification criteria and deficiencies of these theories are analyzed.

关 键 词：汉字类型理论 六书说 三书说 分类标准 不足 

分 类 号：H122[语言文字—汉语]