火针点刺放血加挑刺局部治疗急性痛风性关节炎的临床观察  

Clinical observation of fire bloodletting puncture combined with local needle-pricking in the treatment of acute gouty arthritis

作　　者：邓春艳 谢海毅[2] DENG Chun-yan;XIE Hai-yi(The Second Affiliated Hospital of Guangdong Medical University, Zhanjiang 524000, China;Guangdong Nongken Central Hospital, Zhanjiang 524000, China)

机构地区：[1]广东医科大学附属第二医院 [2]广东省农垦中心医院,广东湛江524000

出　　处：《广东医科大学学报》2019年第4期469-471,共3页Journal of Guangdong Medical University

摘　　要：目的观察火针点刺放血加挑刺局部治疗急性痛风性关节炎的效果。方法选取急性痛风性关节炎患者60例,随机分为对照组和实验组,每组30例。对照组给予秋水仙碱治疗,实验组应用火针点刺放血加挑刺局部治疗,比较两组患者的即时止痛效果、疗效和不良反应发生情况。结果实验组的即时止痛效果以及临床疗效均明显优于对照组,而不良反应发生率则低于对照组,差异均有统计学意义(P<0.05或0.01)。结论针对急性痛风性关节炎患者应用火针点刺放血加挑刺局部治疗可有效缓解疼痛,安全有效,值得推广应用。Objective To investigate the effect of fire bloodletting puncture combined with local needle-pricking in the treatment of acute gouty arthritis. Methods Sixty patients with acute gouty arthritis were selected and randomized divided into the Control Group and Experimental Group, 30 cases in each group. The Control Group was treated with colchicine while the Experimental Group was treated with fire bloodletting puncture combined with local needle-pricking. The two groups were observed and compared in terms of the immediate analgesic effect, efficacy and incidence of adverse reactions. Results The immediate analgesic effect of the Experimental Group was significantly higher than that of the Control Group (P<0.05), the total effective rate of the Experimental Group was superior to that of the Control Group (P<0.05), the incidence of adverse reactions in the Experimental Group was lower than that of the Control Group, and the differences were statistically significant (P<0.05 or 0.01). Conclusion The application of fire bloodletting puncture combined with local needle-pricking in the treatment of acute gouty arthritis can effectively alleviate pain and is safe and effective. It is worth clinical promotion.

关 键 词：火针点刺放血 挑刺局部 急性痛风性关节炎 

分 类 号：R589[医药卫生—内分泌]