检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:潘思思 PAN Sisi(Anhui University, Hefei 230000, China)
机构地区:[1]安徽大学法学院
出 处:《四川职业技术学院学报》2019年第3期19-22,共4页Journal of Sichuan Vocational and Technical College
摘 要:加强国家对未成年人监护的干预是亲权与监护的分离以及家庭监护的缺陷所引向的必然趋势。但就我国目前立法体例来看,我国采用的英美法系大监护模式存在一定的缺陷,不利于实现未成年子女利益最大化。针对立法的不足以及我国的现实情况,提出了建立亲权与监护二元结构的监护模式,构建国家监护监督体系,完善国家直接代行监护体系,以期实现我国未成年人监护的公法化,最大限度地弥补家庭自治的不足,维护和保障未成年人的合法权益。Strengthening the state's intervention in the guardianship of minors is an inevitable trend of the separation of parental rights and guardianship and the defects of family guardianship. However, as far as China's current legislative system is concerned, the large guardianship model of the Anglo-American law system adopted in China has certain defects, which is not conducive to maximizing the benefits of underage children. In view of the shortage of legislation and the reality of our country, it proposes the establishment of the guardianship mode of the dual structure of parental rights and guardianship, the construction of the national guardianship supervision system, and the improvement of the state direct guardianship system in order to realize the public law of the guardianship of minors in China. It compensates for the lack of family autonomy and safeguards and protects the legitimate rights and interests of minors.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:18.118.210.110