“智能+”模式下裁判形成的过程分析  

Analysis of the Process of Referee Formation in “Intelligence +” Mode

作　　者：谢慧 XIE Hui

机构地区：[1]山东师范大学法学院

出　　处：《济南大学学报（社会科学版）》2019年第4期43-53,157-158,共13页Journal of University of Jinan:Social Science Edition

基　　金：山东省社会科学规划研究项目“基层法治社会建构中的司法治理研究”(项目编号:17CFXJ05);教育部人文社会科学青年项目“实现个案正义的法律修辞学进路研究”(项目编号:15YJC820046)阶段性成果

摘　　要：从法律适用的理论来看,司法裁判的形成是一个规则与法官共同作用的结果。裁判形成的基本框架为司法三段论模型,但实际上裁判的形成过程却具有多层的复杂结构。法律适用的理论脉络打开了人工智能在司法中形式推理和非单调推理的思路。然而,基于数据和算法的人工智能无论从小前提的形成、大前提的建构,还是裁判结论的获致,都无法像法官一样思考。因此,人工智能在裁判形成过程中的意义十分有限,它在目前仅能为法官裁判提供辅助功能,并在未来对司法的介入亦不应呈扩张趋势。From the theory of law application, the formation of judicial judgment is the result of combing the rules and judges. The basic framework for the formation of judgement is the judicial syllogism model, but in fact the formation process of the referee has multiple layers of complex structure. The theoretical context of law application opens up the idea of artificial intelligence in formal justice and non-monotonic reasoning in the judiciary. However, data and algorithms based artificial intelligence cannot be considered like a judge regardless of the formation of a small premise, the construction of a major premise, or the conclusion of a judge’s conclusion. Therefore, the significance of artificial intelligence in the formation of judgment is very limited. At present, it can only provide assistance for judges, and in the future, should be cautious when expanding it to judicial intervention.

关 键 词：司法裁判 法律适用 人工智能 人工神经网络系统 法官思维 

分 类 号：D926[政治法律—法学]