《孙子兵法》文体学价值再评价  

Re-evaluation of Stylistic Value of The Art of War

作　　者：侯文华 HOU Wen-hua(Department of Humanities and Social Sciences,Beijing Language and Culture University, Beijing 100083,China)

机构地区：[1]北京语言大学人文社会科学学部

出　　处：《齐鲁学刊》2019年第4期125-132,共8页Qilu Journal

基　　金：国家社科基金重大项目“中国上古知识、观念与文献体系的生成与发展研究”(11&ZD103);教育部人文社会科学研究青年基金项目“先秦经典阐释与文体研究”(16YJC751006);中央高校基本科研业务专项资金资助(19YJ030004)

摘　　要：《孙子兵法》成书于春秋后期,较《论语》《老子》《墨子》为早,较《荀子》等文献更早。此文献包含了多个方面的文体学价值:行文中使用了主客问答的形式,是假设问对体的先声;全书十三篇,各篇主题鲜明,有明确的论证中心和严密的论证过程,结构浑融,语言凝练,论证方法多样,已是完整的专题论说文的形式,一般文学史界所普遍认同的《荀子》代表了专题论说文成熟形态的说法应该得到订正;此外,《孙子兵法》还是最早使用意义性篇题和最早注意到作者署名问题的文献。As an excellent traditional literature with profound influence on Chinese ideology and culture, the ideological connotation of The Art of War has always been favored, but its stylistic value has not been paid due attention to. The Art of War was written earlier than the Analects of Confucius, Laozi, Mozi, Xunzi, and other documents in the late Spring and Autumn period. The Art of War contains many stylistic values: the form of subject-object question-and-answer is used in the text, which is the forerunner of the hypothetical question. There are thirteen articles of The Art of War, each of which has a distinct theme, a clear argumentation center and a strict argumentation process. And its structure is muddy, its language is concise, and its argumentation methods are various. It is already a complete form of special argumentation. The statement that Xunzi, which is generally accepted by the general literal history, represents the mature form of special argumentation should be revised. The earliest literature to use meaningful topics;the first literature to notice the author’s signature.

关 键 词：《孙子兵法》 假设问对体 专题论说文 意义性篇题 署名问题 

分 类 号：I207.62[文学—中国文学]