检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:殷晓三[1] YIN Xiaosan(School of Architecture and Civil Engineering,Zhongyuan University of Technology,Zhengzhou 451191,China)
机构地区:[1]中原工学院建筑工程学院
出 处:《地震工程与工程振动》2019年第3期143-150,共8页Earthquake Engineering and Engineering Dynamics
基 金:国家自然科学基金项目(51408621);河南省高等学校重点科研项目(14B560007)~~
摘 要:为了深入地认识和理解无明显屈服特征构件的屈服点确定方法,首先,揭示了已有的屈服点确定方法的基本原理;其次,对等能量法、最远点法和双直线能量等效面积法的计算方法和计算步骤进行了简化和改进;再次,比较不同屈服点确定方法之间的关系和计算结果,对计算结果存在的差异进行了理论分析;最后,通过实例验证了理论分析的正确性,并对不同屈服点确定方法进行了分析和评价。通过理论分析和实例验证,得出结论:屈服位移由大小依次为等能量法、最远点法和双直线能量等效面积法;计算工作量由大到小依次为双直线能量等效面积法、最远点法、等能量法。It is significant to derive the yield point of structural components without obvious yield features in order to evaluate the ductility and energy dissipation capacity of these structures.However,there is no unified and definite expression of yield point determination methods for structural components without obvious yield features.For above problems,firstly,the existing methods employed to determine the yield point were summarized and the basic principles of these methods were revealed.Secondly,calculation method and calculation procedure were simplified and improved.Thirdly,theoretical analysis of relationship and reasons of different calculation results among above methods were carried out.Finally,the correctness of theoretical analysis results was verified by an example.The conclusion is obtained that the yield displacement calculated by above three methods from the size followed by equal energy method,the furthest point method,and bilinear energy equivalent area method;the amount of the calculation work from the size followed by bilinear energy equivalent area method,the furthest point method,and the equal energy method.
关 键 词:屈服点 延性系数 等能量法 最远点法 双直线能量等效面积法
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:3.148.108.240