检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:刘尧[1] Liu Yao
机构地区:[1]浙江师范大学教育评论研究所
出 处:《西北工业大学学报(社会科学版)》2019年第2期35-39,共5页Journal of Northwestern Polytechnical University(Social Sciences)
摘 要:中华人民共和国成立七十年来,人文社会科学评价大约依次出现过效用评价、内容评价和形式评价三大方式。过去的七十年,我国人文社会科学评价无论是何种方式均是由行政主导的。实践证明,行政主导的评价使用其评价结果对评价客体实施的奖惩性管理,常常事与愿违,难以很好地达成评价目的。因此,新时代的人文社会科学评价应该坚持正确的价值导向与以学术质量为本两条原则,解决好评价标准的确立、评价功利化的改善、学术共同体自律的实现、学者学术诚信的建立以及评价理想境界的达到等评价难点问题。For the past seven decades since the founding of the People's Republic of China,the evaluation of the humanities and social sciences has successively appeared in three major ways:utility evaluation,content evaluation and formal evaluation.During the past seventy years,the evaluation of China's humanities and social sciences has been dominated by the administration.Practice has proved that the executive-led evaluation uses the results of its evaluation to implement the reward and punishment management of the evaluation object,and it is often difficult to achieve the evaluation purpose.Therefore,the evaluation of humanities and social sciences in the new era should adhere to the two principles of correct value orientation and academic quality so as to solve the issues of establishment of evaluation standards,improve the evaluation of utilitarianism,realize the self-discipline of academic community,establish and evaluate the academic credit of scholars in an ideal way.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.222