直接药敏试验与常规药敏试验在临床血液细菌鉴定检验中的效果研究  

Study on the effects of direct susceptibility test and routine susceptibility test in identification test of clinical blood bacteria

作　　者：黄剑芳[1] HUANG Jianfang(The First People's Hospital of Huizhou,Guangdong,Huizhou 516003,China)

机构地区：[1]广东省惠州市第一人民医院

出　　处：《中国医药科学》2019年第13期121-123,共3页China Medicine And Pharmacy

摘　　要：目的探讨分析研究直接药敏试验与常规药敏试验在临床血液细菌鉴定检验中的效果。方法选取本院2012年2月~2017年2月收集的32400例临床血液细菌标本为研究对象,32400例细菌标本分别进行直接药敏试验以及常规药敏试验,并比较分析两种检验方式的检验结果。结果直接药敏试验的检验结果与常规药敏试验的检验结果比较,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。结论在临床血液细菌鉴定检验中,直接药敏试验与常规药敏试验的检测结果无明显差异,在进行临床检验工作时可以根据实际情况选择合理的检验手段,提高检验效率。Objective To explore and analyze the effects of direct susceptibility test and routine susceptibility test in identification test of clinical blood bacteria. Methods 32400 clinical blood bacterial specimens collected in our hospital from February 2012 to February 2017 were selected as research objects.32400 bacterial specimens were respectively given direct susceptibility test and routine susceptibility test.The test results of the two test methods were compared and analyzed. Results There was no statistically significant difference in results of direct susceptibility test and routine susceptibility test (P > 0.05). Conclusion In identification test of clinical blood bacteria,results of direct susceptibility test and routine susceptibility test have no significant difference.In the clinical laboratory work,reasonable test methods can be selected according to the actual situation to improve the test efficiency.

关 键 词：直接药敏试验 常规药敏试验 血液细菌 鉴定检验 

分 类 号：R446.5[医药卫生—诊断学]