检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:梁鑫 章素珍 LIANG Xin;ZHANG Su-zhen(School of Finance,Renmin University of China,Beijing 100872,China)
出 处:《经济体制改革》2019年第4期174-179,共6页Reform of Economic System
摘 要:世界典型国家文化行业资产管理体制具有不同的改革历程及特点,它们分别是英国以政企分离为核心的政府适度监管模式、美国以产权多元化为改革重点的政府低度监管模式,以及日本以建立大型文化产业投资公司为方向的政府主导型管理模式。我国文化产业国有资产管理体制改革应将发达国家的改革经验本土化,剥离经营性文化资产,建殳统一的国有文化资产出资人机构和大型国有文化资产运营机构,积极探索文化产业政企分离、产权多元化的改革路径,完善文化产业法律法规体系,以对国有文化资产产权进行清晰划分和有效保护。Typical countries in the world went through different reforms of their cultural industry asset management system which has their own characteristics. For example, they are British govemmenfs moderate supervision model with the separation of government and enterprises as the core, American government's low-level supervision model with the diversification of property rights as the focus of reform, and Japanese government-led management model with the direction of establishing large-scale cultural industry investment companies. It is suggested that the reform of the state-owned asset management system of China's cultural industry should localize the reform experience of developed countries, divest business assets, establish a unified state-owned cultural asset investor institution and large-scale cultural industry investment companies in order to achieve the full separation of cultural companies and the government.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.15