《史记·儒林列传》与《汉书·艺文志》的学术价值及其互补性  

The Academic Value and Complementarity of Shih Chi and Biographies of Confucian Scholars and On the classification of Han Shu

作　　者：李小成[1] Li Xiaocheng(School of Literature,Xi'an University,Xi'an 710065,China)

机构地区：[1]西安文理学院文学院

出　　处：《西安文理学院学报（社会科学版）》2019年第3期5-11,共7页Journal of Xi’an University(Social Sciences Edition)

摘　　要：司马谈早就在《论六家要旨》中对先秦的学术流派做过总结,司马迁在《史记·儒林列传》中对先秦和西汉前期的学术发展做了一个大致的梳理,其中多论今文经学,然亦及于古文经学,虽说不上全面,但有开创之功。后汉班固承司马之学,其《汉书·艺文志》分门别类,条理井然,于各家各派典籍记载分明,有辨章学术、考镜源流之功,以补《史记·儒林列传》之粗疏。Sima Qian has long summarized the academic schools of the Pre-Qin Dynasty in On the Six Mentors and he has roughly combed the academic development of the Pre-Qin Dynasty and the early Western Han Dynasty in Shih Chi and Biographies of Confucian Scholars . Among them, he mostly talks about modern classics, but also mentions about ancient classics. There is no doubt that he has made pioneering achievements. After the Han Dynasty, Ban Gu inherited Sima Qian s learning. His On the classification of Han Shu was classified and organized. It was well documented in various schools of classics. It had the merits of discerning rules and learning and examining the origins, in order to make up for the negligence of Han Shu and Biographies of Confucian Scholars.

关 键 词：《史记》 《汉书》 儒林列传 艺文志 

分 类 号：I206.2[文学—中国文学]