检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:周德金[1] Zhou Dejin
机构地区:[1]浙江省高级人民法院
出 处:《中国社会科学院研究生院学报》2019年第4期80-90,共11页Journal of Graduate School of Chinese Academy of Social Sciences
摘 要:法人犯罪本质上仅是一种观念上的犯罪。法人犯罪成立与否,在于对法人失范行为的管理与惩治模式的选择。比较域外法人犯罪制度,可发现我国单位犯罪制度在惩罚依据、罪责模式、归责原则等基础性问题上存在诸多相互抵牾之处。我国单位犯罪制度在矛盾和混乱之中走上主体扩张道路,但其表面的扩张带来了更多司法失衡问题。我们应在符合刑法体系结构及满足刑法自身逻辑的前提下,以理性主义为思想基调,以法人人格为归责依据,坚持单位与其成员刑事责任相对独立,使得两元主体分别回归本体责任。Corporate crime is essentially a conceptual crime.The establishment of corporate crime rests with the choices of the management and punishment modes of corporate misconducts.Compared with foreign judicial system for corporate crime, Chinese judicial system for corporate crime contains many conflicts on the basic issues of punishment basis, guilt patterns and imputation principles.In contradictions and confusions, Chinese judicial system has embarked on a road of subject expansion, but the superficial expansion has brought much more judicial misbalances.Under the premise of according with the criminal law system structure and fitting the logic of criminal law, we should take rationalism as ideological keynote, and corporate personality as the basis of imputation.In addition, we should insist on the relative independence of the criminal responsibility of the unit from that of its members in order to make the two main parts return to their ontological responsibilities.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.222