检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:刘海锋 朱彬荣 张宏杰 刘亚多 胡丹梅 孙斌[3] Liu Haifeng;Zhu Binrong;Zhang Hongjie;Liu Yaduo;Hu Danmei;Sun Bin(China Electricity Power Research Institute,Beijing 100055,China;School of Civil Engineering and Architecture,Shanghai University of Electric Power,Shanghai 200090,China;College of Energy and Mechanical Engineering,Zhejiang Sci-Tech University,Hangzhou 310018,China)
机构地区:[1]中国电力科学研究院有限公司,北京100055 [2]上海电力学院能源与机械工程学院,上海200090 [3]浙江理工大学土木工程系,杭州310018
出 处:《太阳能学报》2019年第7期2036-2044,共9页Acta Energiae Solaris Sinica
基 金:国家自然科学基金(51408569);中国电力科学研究院科技创新基金(GC83-15-002)
摘 要:为了对比钢管格构式和圆筒式塔架对风力机尾流扰动特性,首先根据塔架的控制荷载,设计承载力和高度相同的直筒式塔架和钢管格构式塔架。然后在Fluent中,完成2种塔架风力机的流场计算,得出两者塔架近尾迹流场、远尾迹流场及风力机和塔架风荷载的特征。对比结果表明:1)钢管格构式塔架的顺风向风荷载和横风向风荷载的波动幅度远低于圆筒式塔架,有利于减小结构疲劳破坏风险并降低结构的风振系数;2)钢管格构塔架的尾流流速及湍流强度的恢复距离低于圆筒式塔架,有利于提高风力机的排列密度;3)钢管格构式塔架风力机的叶片阻力和功率与圆筒式塔架基本相同。To compare the disturbance properties of latticed and pipe tower on wake of wind turbines,firsty,a lattice and a circular pipe wind turbine tower are designed with th same height and loading capacity;Secondly,the fluid simulation is finished in the software Fluent and the properties of the near wake,far wake and wind load of the wind turbines with two types of towers is calculated.The comparsion showed that:1)The fluctiuation of the cross and down wind load of lattice tower is far less than those of the circular pipe tower,which helps to decrease the failure of fatigue and the wind vibration factor;2)the recovery length of velocity and turbulent intensity for the latticed wind tower is less than those of circular pipe tower;3)the down wind load of the blades and the power rate of the turbine of the latticed tower is slightly less than those of the circular pipe tower.
分 类 号:TU20[建筑科学—建筑设计及理论]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:18.218.164.141