检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:李波阳[1] 贾敏 Li Boyang;Jia Min(Gansu University of Political Science and Law,Lanzhou Gansu 730070,China)
机构地区:[1]甘肃政法学院
出 处:《辽宁公安司法管理干部学院学报》2019年第4期75-83,共9页Journal of Liaoning Administrators College of Police and Justice
摘 要:减刑、假释制度是我国监狱刑罚执行中的重要内容,对鼓励罪犯改过自新、调控原判刑罚以及促进社会和谐具有独特的作用。在实践中,该制度不论在立法还是司法层面,都存在一些亟待解决的问题。2017年实施的《最高人民法院关于办理减刑、假释案件具体应用法律的规定》虽然对此作了补充和完善,但仍然存在制约机制、考核制度、执行依据和地区差异等方面的问题,有待于在今后的立法和实践中进一步完善。The commutation and parole system is an important part of the execution of prison penalties in China.It has a unique role in encouraging criminals to rehabilitate themselves,regulating the original sentence and promoting social harmony.In practice,there are some problems to be solved in the system,whether at the legislative or judicial level.Although they were supplemented and improved in the “Provisions of the Supreme People’s Court on the Application of Laws for the Commutation and Parole” in 2017,there are still problems in the control mechanism,assessment system,implementation basis and regional differences to be further improved in future legislation and practice.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.43