错案责任追究制度的目标偏移与矫正——以西北地区某基层法院错案责任追究的实践为考察对象  

The Objective Deviation and Correction of the System of Accountability for Misjudged Cases——The object of investigation is the practice of accountability for the misjudged cases in a grass-roots court in northwest china

作　　者：江钦辉 JIANG Qin-hui(Institute of Law,The Academy of Social Sciences of Xinjiang,Urumqi 830011 China)

机构地区：[1]新疆社会科学院法学研究所

出　　处：《河北法学》2019年第7期185-200,共16页Hebei Law Science

摘　　要：实践中,法官错案责任的追究基本采取以裁判结果错误为主导的追究模式,并只对错案责任法官追究“经济责任”,体现了基层法院一种“避重就轻”的实践逻辑。但这种实践运行模式却导致了错案责任追究制度的设立目标发生偏移。而错案责任追究的实践运行之所以发生目标上的偏移,既有错案责任要件制度设计的原因,也有运行机制的问题,还有制度环境的因素。因此,应通过错案责任构成要件认定标准的明确和运行机制的司法化改革以及外部环境的优化予以矫正,以确保制度目标的实现和功能的发挥。The practice of the fault liability of the judge mainly adopt the wrong result of the judge as the dominant mode of investigation in the practice of grass-roots courts. And the judges who are responsible for misjudged cases will only be pursued “economic responsibility”. It reflects the practical logic of avoiding the important and dwell on the trivial in grass-roots courts. However,this practical operation mode has deviated from the establishment goal of the fault liability investigation system. However,the deviation of the target caused by the practice investigation of wrongful cases is not only the cause of elements system design,but also the problem of operation mechanism,as well as the factor of system environment. Therefore,it is necessary to correct the constitutive elements of the accountability of the wrong case,the judicial reform of the operational mechanism and the optimization of the external environment,so as to ensure the realization of the goals and functions of the system.

关 键 词：错案责任 司法责任制 改革 偏移 矫正 

分 类 号：DF8[政治法律—法学]