检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:姚大志[1] Yao Dazhi
出 处:《法制与社会发展》2019年第4期154-166,共13页Law and Social Development
基 金:国家“2011计划”·司法文明协同创新中心研究成果;教育部人文社会科学重点研究基地重大项目“制度文明的哲学理念创新”(16JJD720008)的阶段性成果
摘 要:无论在生物学上还是在伦理学上,基因编辑都是非常重要的事件,需要我们进行理性的反思。从道德哲学的观点反思基因干预,我们应该追问三个问题:这种基因干预是对的还是错的?它是一件好事还是坏事?它是正义的还是不正义的?我们要想回答这样三个问题,就需要某种评判的标准。基于"权利"的标准,我们认为这种基因干预是正确的,起码不是错误的。基于"帕累托改善"的标准,我们认为这种基因干预是一件好事,而不是坏事。基于"机会平等"的标准,我们主张这种基因干预是正义的。也就是说,我们有充分的道德理由支持基因干预。Gene editing is very important both in biology and ethics, which requires rational reflection. Reflecting on gene intervention from the perspective of moral philosophy, we should ask three questions: Is this gene intervention right or wrong? Is it a good thing or a bad thing? Is it just or unjust? If we want to answer these three questions, we need some kind of criterion. Based on the "right" criterion, we believe that this genetic intervention is correct, at least not wrong. Based on the criterion of "Pareto Improvement", we believe that this genetic intervention is a good thing, not a bad thing. Based on the criterion of "equality of opportunity", we advocate that such genetic intervention is just. That is to say, we have good moral reasons to support gene intervention.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.222