检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:章孙逊 张守红[1] 张英 吴思婷 ZHANG Sun-xun;ZHANG Shou-hong;ZHANG Ying;WU Si-ting(School of Soil and Water Conservation,Beijing Forestry University,Beijing 100083,China)
机构地区:[1]北京林业大学水土保持学院
出 处:《环境科学》2019年第8期3618-3625,共8页Environmental Science
基 金:国家自然科学基金项目(51609004);国家水体污染控制与治理专项(2017ZX07102-001)
摘 要:植被是绿色屋顶的关键组成部分,也是影响绿色屋顶径流量和水质的重要因素之一.本文基于大花马齿苋(Portulaca grandiflora)、佛甲草(Sedum lineare)、高羊茅(Festuca elata)和无植被(对照组)这4种植被覆盖类型绿色屋顶2017年植物生长特征、降雨和径流过程的监测,及对雨水和各绿色屋顶径流中营养元素(NH4^+-N、NO3^--N、NO2^--N和PO43^--P)与重金属(Cr、Cd、Cu和Ni)的浓度检测,定量分析了不同植被覆盖类型对绿色屋顶径流量和污染负荷的影响.结果表明:①大花马齿苋、佛甲草、高羊茅和对照组绿色屋顶的平均径流削减率分别为51. 3%、41. 5%、36. 3%和33. 0%,大花马齿苋绿色屋顶径流削减率显著高于高羊茅和对照组绿色屋顶(P <0. 05);②大花马齿苋和佛甲草绿色屋顶是NH4^+-N、NO3^--N、NO2^--N和PO43^--P的汇,且地上生物量更大的大花马齿苋绿色屋顶对营养元素的污染负荷削减率(分别为59. 6%、99. 9%、82. 5%和25. 7%)均高于佛甲草绿色屋顶(分别为52. 5%、89. 3%、75. 3%和7. 8%),而高羊茅和对照组绿色屋顶是NH4^+-N和NO2^--N的汇,是NO3^--N和PO43^--P的源;③大花马齿苋、佛甲草、高羊茅和对照组绿色屋顶均是DCd的汇,污染负荷削减率分别为19. 2%、41. 5%、38. 4%和31. 1%,但4组绿色屋顶均是DCr、DCu和DNi的源.As a key component of green roofs,vegetation may have significant impacts on both the quantity and quality of runoff. In this study,the effects of vegetation on both the quantity and quality of runoff from green roofs are investigated through monitoring the rainfall and runoff processes of green roofs with four different types of vegetation cover(Portulaca grandiflora,Sedum lineare,Festuca elata,and a non-vegetated bed as control) during 2017. The growth characteristics of the vegetation were also monitored,and the nutrients (NH4^+-N,NO3^--N,NO2^--N,and PO43^--P) and heavy metals(Cr,Cd,Cu,and Ni) in the rainwater and runoff were measured. The results show that the average rainfall event-based runoff reduction rates for the four green roof types were 51.3%,41.5%,36.3%,and 33.0%,respectively. Furthermore,the runoff reduction rates of the green roof planted with Portulaca grandiflora were significantly higher than both the Festuca elata green roof and the non-vegetated bed(P<0.05). The green roofs planted with Portulaca grandiflora and Sedum lineare both acted as sinks for the nutrients. The Portulaca grandiflora green roof,which had a higher biomass,provides higher nutrient load reduction rates( 59. 6%,99. 9%,82. 5%,and 25.7% for NH4^+-N,NO3^--N,NO2^--N,and PO43^--P,respectively) than the Sedum lineare green roof( 52. 5%,89. 3%,75. 3%,and 7.8%,respectively). The Festuca elata green roof and the non-vegetation bed acted as sinks for NH4^+-N and NO2^--N but were sources of NO3^--N and PO43^--P.All four of the green roofs were sinks for DCd,with pollution load reduction rates of 19. 2%,41. 5%,38. 4%,and 31. 1%,respectively. However,all the green roofs acted as the sources of DCr,DCu,and DNi.
关 键 词:绿色屋顶 植被 径流水质 污染负荷 营养元素 重金属
分 类 号:X52[环境科学与工程—环境工程]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.117