《燕丹子》成书与二本分行考说  

The Study on the Creation of Yan Dan Zi and the Branch of the Two Version System

作　　者：黄觉弘 HUANG Juehong(Institute of Historical Documents,Central China Normal University,Wuhan,Hubei 430079)

机构地区：[1]华中师范大学历史文献学研究所

出　　处：《中国文学研究》2019年第3期77-81,共5页Research of Chinese Literature

基　　金：国家社科基金项目“宋元伊洛《春秋》学研究”(15BZS013)

摘　　要：燕太子丹募使荆轲刺秦王的故事,自战国末以来即已广为流传。《燕丹子》成书当不晚于魏晋之际。《燕丹子》在后世流传中,出现了一卷本和三卷本两种版本,一卷本今已失传,今传本是三卷本,以《永乐大典》卷四九〇八所载为代表。一卷本与三卷本自隋唐以来即已分行,二本存在着较大差异,其最大的差异,即在于文末是否记述高渐离筑击秦始皇故事。能够证实的三卷本,一直都是终于戛然而止的荆轲骂言,而敦煌写本《类林》残卷、《太平御览》所引《燕丹子》则叙及高渐离筑击秦始皇故事,与三卷本明显不同。此外,二本还有一些文辞差异也值得注意。The story of Jing Ke’s assassin of Emperor Qin has been widely circulated since the end of the Warring States period. Yan Dan Zi is not later than the Wei and Jin Dynasties. In the later generations of Yan Dan Zi,there appeared two versions of one volume and three volumes. One volume has been lost today,and the present biography is three volumes,represented by Volume 4908 of The Yongle Canon. One volume and three volumes had been branched since the Sui and Tang dynasties. There are great differences in the two volumes and the biggest one is whether the story of Gao Jianli’s attack on Emperor Qin is described at the end of the article. The three volumes that can be confirmed have been ended with the content of Jing Ke’s scolding. The story of Gao Jianli attacking Emperor Qin in the residual volume of Lei Lin,the Dunhuang manuscript and Yan Dan Zi quoted in Tai Ping Imperial Examination are all obviously different from those of the three volumes. Besides,there are still some differences in diction between the two books.

关 键 词：《燕丹子》 《永乐大典》 《类林》 《太平御览》 二本分行 

分 类 号：I207.62[文学—中国文学]