检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:贺婧[1] 李飞[1] 刘宝锋[1] HE Jing;LI Fei;LIU Baofeng(Traffic and Surveying Engineering School of Yangling Vocational and Technical College,Yangling 712100,China)
机构地区:[1]杨凌职业技术学院交通与测绘工程分院
出 处:《地理信息世界》2019年第4期80-83,共4页Geomatics World
基 金:杨凌职业技术学院自然科学研究基金项目(A2018037);杨凌职业技术学院人文社科(教改)研究基金项目(GJ1837)资助
摘 要:以四川地区42个地面气象站点的降雨数据为基础,对TRMM和CMORPH降雨数据所反映的降雨特征进行对比分析。通过不同分布图对比分析两种卫星数据反映区域降雨的能力。可看出两种卫星数据所反映出的降雨特点与站点数据反映的特点有较高的相似性,都能反映较为一致的降雨细节特征,但仍然存在差异。其中CMORPH数据的平均相关系数和拟合优度值比TRMM数据稍高,具有更好的表现能力。Using the rainfall data of 42 ground meteorological stations in Sichuan as a benchmark,the rainfall characteristics reflected by TRMM and CMORPH were compared and analyzed.The ability of these two kinds of satellite data to reflect regional rainfall was explored through distribution maps.It was found that both of the two kinds of satellite data could capture detailed rainfall properties,which are significantly consistent to those reflected by site data,while there are still some differences.More detailedly,CMORPH performed better than TRMM as it had higher values of mean correlation coefficient and goodness of fit between satellite data and site data than TRMM.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.15