检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:吴洋[1] WU Yang(College of International Business,Shenyang Normal University,Liaoning 110034,China)
机构地区:[1]沈阳师范大学国际商学院
出 处:《佛山科学技术学院学报(社会科学版)》2019年第3期57-67,共11页Journal of Foshan University(Social Science Edition)
基 金:辽宁省哲学社会科学规划基金项目(L18BJY003)
摘 要:财政性环保支出是地方政府环保工作的资金保障,该项支出的使用效率成为当前需要研究的课题。运用超效率SBM模型以及全局参比Malmquist模型对2011-2016年间中国31个省、自治区、直辖市的环境保护财政支出效率及“生产率”进行了测算,结果表明6年间各地区的环保支出普遍存在DEA无效率情况,经济发达人口密集这种对环境污染带来巨大压力的因素并非必然导致环保支出效率低,环境污染压力小的省份也并不必然处于技术前沿。全国范围内的环保支出生产率变化呈波动趋势,但平均而言生产率提高了3.697%,技术前沿平均前移了1.746%。基于以上分析,各省份之间应进行环保支出使用的经验交流,完善环保相关监督机制,优化环保单位的综合实力。The fiscal expenditure of environment protection is the capital guarantee for the local governments’tasks of protecting environment,and the study of efficiency and productivity changes of this expenditure has been the priority now.This article applied the Super-efficiency SBM model and Global Reference Malmquist model to measure the efficiency and productivity changes of the environment protection expenditure of all the provinces in China during 2011-2016.This paper finds out that during the 6 years most of the provinces are DEA-inefficient,and the factors which lead to heavy pollution,like prosperous economy and high density of population,will not definitely cause lower efficiency scores of environment protection expenditure and those provinces with less pollution pressure will not be absolutely on the technological frontier.The productivity change of environment protection fiscal spending fluctuates,but the average productivity change shows a progress of 3.697%,and the technological frontier moves forward by 1.746% on average.Finally,the article provides some suggestions based on the analysis above.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.3