检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:陈莉 黄晶晶 CHEN Li;HUANG Jing-jing(School of Economics and Management, Anhui Jianzhu University, Hefei 230601, China)
机构地区:[1]安徽建筑大学经济与管理学院
出 处:《嘉应学院学报》2019年第4期49-54,共6页Journal of Jiaying University
基 金:2018年度安徽省社会科学创新发展研究课题(2018CX018)
摘 要:在国内外对乡村治理研究的基础上,分析了中央提出的“三权分置”改革对于乡村治理的影响,运用博弈论中“奥尔森困境”的模型,得出如下结论:“三权分置”改革促进了土地流转,提高了农民收入,农民参与乡村自治的政治热情高涨;同时原有村庄内的利益主体增加、利益格局发生改变,由此导致村内利益博弈的“奥尔森困境”.就此提出四条建议来找到村集体内的利益最大公约数,实现良好的乡村治理.In this paper, on the basis of home and abroad research on rural governance, analyzes the reform of "separation of division" put forward by the central influence on rural governance, the use of the "Olson Dilemma" in game theory model, the following conclusion:"Separation Division Reform" to promote the land circulation, increases the fanners1 income,&mers* political participation in rural autonomy of enthusiasm. At the same time, the interest subjects in the original village increased and the pattern of interest changed, which led to the "Olsen Dilemma'* of interest game in the village. This paper puts forward four suggestions to find the nwdmum common divisor of interests within the village collective and achieve good rural governance.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.15