检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:王惠瑢 罗晓杰[1] Wang Huirong;Luo Xiaojie(College of Foreign Languages,Zhejiang Normal University,Jinhua Zhejiang 321004,China)
机构地区:[1]浙江师范大学外国语学院,浙江金华321004
出 处:《基础教育外语教学研究》2019年第7期6-11,共6页Foreign Language Teaching & Research in Basic Education
基 金:中国英语阅读教育研究院“十三五”规划第一期专项课题《中学英语阅读课师生互动及其有效性研究》(CERA1351105)的研究成果。
摘 要:本文对比分析熟手教师和新手教师参考型问题提出后等待时间Ⅰ和等待时间Ⅱ的分配情况及其对学生即时口语输出的影响。研究表明,熟手教师等待时间分配优于新手教师;两类教师等待时间Ⅰ均高于等待时间Ⅱ,且对等待时间Ⅱ的使用存在不足;教师参考型问题提出后的等待时间与学生即时口语输出的平均C单位长度相关性最为显著,其次为C单位平均数及平均C单位含S节点数。基于此,本文建议教师要科学预留等待时间Ⅰ,保证学生即时口语输出质量;灵活预留等待时间Ⅱ,提高学生即时口语输出质量。This paper analyzes and compares the distribution of wait timeⅠand wait timeⅡafter the referential question is put forward by experienced and novice teachers and their influence on students’instant language output.The results show wait time of experienced teachers is more reasonably distributed than that of novice teachers;compared with wait timeⅡ,both experienced and novice teachers extend more wait timeⅠ;and both experienced and novice teachers exists inadequacies in terms of the use of wait timeⅡ;the wait time of referential question is most significantly correlated with the average C unit length of students’instant language output,followed by the average number of C unit and the average number of S-node in the C unit.Based on the above research findings,the paper suggests that teacher should plan wait timeⅠreasonably to ensure the quality of students’instant language output and plan wait timeⅡflexibly to improve the quality of students’instant language output.
分 类 号:G642[文化科学—高等教育学]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.81