检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:时宏远[1] Shi Hongyuan
机构地区:[1]贵州财经大学
出 处:《印度洋经济体研究》2019年第4期1-27,157,共28页Indian Ocean Economic and Political Review
基 金:国家社科基金项目“世界主要大国的印度洋政策研究”(19BGJ003)的阶段性成果
摘 要:虽然软实力资源比较丰富,但印度的软实力比不上西方主要国家,也不如中国、日本和韩国。这主要有两个原因。一是评估机构的排名本身存在瑕疵:国际评估机构立场明显偏向西方国家;国际评估机构选取的指标不利于印度。二是印度软实力确实也存在很多不足之处。无论文化和民主制度,还是外交和海外印度人群体的影响都存在一些缺陷。此外,与主要大国相比,印度的硬实力不够突出也制约了印度软实力的提升。印度要想成为一个软实力大国和强国,还有很长的路要走。Although soft power resources are abundant, but India' s soft power is no good than that of major western countries and China, Japan and South Korea. There are two main reasons for this. First, there are some flaws in the ranking of assessment institutions: the positions of international assessment institutions are obviously biased towards India;the indicators chosen by them are not favorable for India. Second, Indias soft power does have many shortcomings. India' s culture and democracy, as well as diplomacy and the influence of the Indian diaspora, are flawed. In addition, Indias lack of hard power also limits its soft power. India has a long way to go to become a soft power and great power.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.15