检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:柳树[1] Liu Shu
机构地区:[1]云南大学印度研究院
出 处:《印度洋经济体研究》2019年第4期45-63,157,158,共21页Indian Ocean Economic and Political Review
基 金:国家社科基金重大研究专项项目《提高中印边界战略管控能力研究》(项目编号:18VFH012)的阶段性成果
摘 要:国内外学者在研究中国和印度在印度洋的关系时,较多采用现实主义研究范式,易于突出中印之间的冲突,多对未来前景持悲观态度。面对复杂的研究对象,现实主义研究范式有其合理性一面,却也有相关缺陷。本文尝试运用新自由制度主义分析框架对中印在印度洋的互动展开研究,发现中印在印度洋基本上处于一种合作而非冲突的状态;固然两国有竞争的一面,但是完全可以通过加强政策协调,与其他相关国家一起,在印度洋建立更加完善有效的合作制度,共同维护印度洋的航行自由与安全。Scholars at home and abroad often use the realism paradigm to study the relationship between China and India in the Indian Ocean, which is easy to highlight the conflict between China and India, and is more pessimistic about the future prospects. In the face of complex research objects, the realism research paradigm has its rationality, but it also has related defects. This paper attempts to use the framework of Neoliberal Institutionalism to study the interaction between China and India in the Indian Ocean. It is found that China and India are basically in a state of cooperation rather than conflict in the Indian Ocean. Although the two countries have a competitive side, they can fully strengthen policy coordination to establish a more perfect and effective cooperation system in the Indian Ocean to jointly safeguard the freedom and safety of navigation in the Indian Ocean with other relevant countries.
分 类 号:D822.335.1[政治法律—政治学]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.117