农业生产托管利益分配模式比较研究  

Comparative Study on Benefit Distribution Model of Trusteeship in Agricultural Production

作　　者：王玉斌[1] 李乾[2] WANG Yu-bin;LI Qian

机构地区：[1]中国农业大学国家农业农村发展研究院 [2]中国农业大学经济管理学院

出　　处：《改革》2019年第8期119-127,共9页Reform

基　　金：国家社会科学基金项目“农地交易的农户行为响应及福利变动研究”(18BJY145)

摘　　要：农业生产托管能够实现服务组织与服务对象之间的共赢,而合同是保障这一共赢利益分配格局得以稳定实现的关键。基于典型案例分析,将农业生产托管利益分配模式划分为无收益约束型、监督主体介入型、保底产量型、“保底产量+分红”型以及合同外附加收益型,五类利益分配模式中服务监督主要形式、服务监督强度、剩余控制权归属以及利益分配模式普适性等要件各异,特定的产生背景决定着各类模式存在的合理性。监督主体介入型与“保底产量+分红”型相结合的利益分配新模式具有其他不同利益分配模式中的优势属性,更具发展潜力。利益分配模式选择应视地区资源禀赋、经济发展水平、托管作物种类等而定。Trusteeship of agricultural production can achieve a win-win situation between service provider and buyer. Contract design is the key factor to ensure enforcement. This paper divides the benefit distribution mechanism of trusteeship in agricultural production into five types, which are the type of unconstrained revenue, type of supervised subject intervention, type of guaranteed minimum production, type of guaranteed minimum production and dividend simultaneous, and type with extra-contract income. The main form of service supervision, the intensity of service supervision, the ownership of residual control rights and the universality of benefit distribution are different in five types. The specific background of the development determines the rationality of the existence of various types. The new type of benefit distribution, which combines the type of supervised subject intervention and the type of guaranteed minimum production and dividend simultaneous, has the advantage attributes of other benefit distribution types, and is full of development potential. The regional resource endowment, the level of economic development, and the crop species of service contract should be considered when choose the benefit distribution model.

关 键 词：农业生产托管 利益分配 规模经营 

分 类 号：F323.4[经济管理—产业经济]