检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:张勤 ZHANG Qin
机构地区:[1]天津财经大学法学院 [2]天津财经大学纠纷解决研究中心 [3]加拿大阿尔伯特大学 [4]汕头仲裁委员会
出 处:《湖北民族学院学报(哲学社会科学版)》2019年第5期1-9,161,共9页Journal of Hubei Minzu University:Philosophy and Social Sciences
基 金:国家社会科学基金重大项目“深化基层矛盾纠纷化解共建共治机制及其风险预判研究”(18ZDA167)
摘 要:进入21世纪以来,纠纷解决研究逐步转入以中国本土为主要对象的新阶段,其中基于定量和定性方法从法社会学角度展开的实证研究取得了长足的进步。从纠纷解决方式、纠纷解决途径偏好、法律意识及权威认同与纠纷解决途径的选择、纠纷解决中的民间法与习惯法四个方面梳理该领域研究所取得的成果。通过梳理发现,本领域的研究不仅在研究方法上有很大的进步,而且在理论创新方面也产生了一系列有推动意义的观点和学说。这些学术努力均有助于建立既扎根于中国本土,又能和国际展开对话的综合性学科“纠纷解决学”。Since the new millennium, dispute resolution studies in China has gradually entered a new stage, starting to pay attention to Chinese local issues, among which, empirical study from the perspective of sociology of law has made remarkable progress. This paper reviews recent academic achievements in this field from four aspects, namely, ways of resolving disputes, preference of dispute resolution, legal consciousness, authority recognition and preference of dispute resolution, folk law and customary law in dispute resolution. Based on this, it further reveals that, dispute resolution studies in China has made progress not only in research methodology but also in theoretical innovation. All these academic efforts greatly contribute to the establishment of the comprehensive discipline “ Studies of Dispute Resolution”, which is deeply rooted in Chinese reality, as well as empowered to communicate with the international academic community.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.145