边境少数民族纠纷调解中习惯法适用逻辑变迁——以中缅边境佤族YH村的纠纷调解过程为例  

The Change of Application Logic of Customary Law in Dispute Mediation for Ethnic Minorities in Border Areas——A Case Study of the Mediation Process of the Wa People in YH Village at China-Myanmar Border

作　　者：董向芸[1] DONG Xiangyun

机构地区：[1]云南师范大学哲学与政法学院

出　　处：《湖北民族学院学报（哲学社会科学版）》2019年第5期23-30,共8页Journal of Hubei Minzu University：Philosophy and Social Sciences

基　　金：国家社会科学基金项目“中缅边境‘农场人’离疆问题治理研究”(16BSH085)

摘　　要：结构主义视角下的法人类学研究,多通过规则适用过程来剖析习惯法效用的发挥,社会层级分类由此成为习惯法适用中的文化切入前提。既有研究显示,对于习惯法的阐释多基于对象群体对传统规则的一致性理解与遵从。与此设定所不同,通过对中缅边境佤族YH村纠纷调解的个案分析发现,现代化带来的价值认知分化推动了个体化发展趋向,并在利益诉求和价值判断两个层面凸显出族群习惯法从“面”到“点”的适用逻辑变迁,进而为重塑规范有效性提供了新视域。From the perspective of structuralism, legal anthropology studies mainly analyze the effectiveness of customary law through the application of rules, taking social stratification as an cultural entry point. The current domestic research on mediation of ethnic minority disputes shows that, the interpretation of customary law is mainly based on the applicable objects′ consistent understanding of and compliance with traditional rules. From the case study of the mediation process of the Wa People in YH village at China-Myanmar border, it can be found that, unlike the existing interpretive framework, the differentiation of value cognition brought by modernization promotes the developmental trend of individualization, and the change of application logic of ethnic customary law from “plane” to “point” is highlighted in the two levels of interest appeal and value judgment, thus providing a new perspective for remoulding the validity of norms.

关 键 词：边境少数民族 纠纷调解 习惯法适用 

分 类 号：D920.4[政治法律—法学]