我国不正当竞争行为的规制路径及其优化  

The Regulation Paths of Unfair Competition Behaviors in China and Their Optimization

作　　者：张永忠[1] 沈玩辉 Zhang Yongzhong;Shen Wanhui

机构地区：[1]华南师范大学法学院 [2]广州白云国际机场股份有限公司

出　　处：《法治社会》2019年第5期12-20,共9页Law-Based Society

摘　　要：我国已形成类型化、一般条款和利益衡量三种不正当竞争行为规制路径。在不正当竞争行为的既有规制路径中,类型化规则涵摄性不足,一般条款过于抽象而具有适用结果的不确定性,利益衡量可以弥补一般条款的不确定性,但存在恣意的危险。优化不正当竞争行为的规制路径,应重视类型化规则的立改废工作,保证立法的张力和先进性;引入竞争秩序损害分析方法,弥补一般条款的不确定;确立竞争秩序、消费者利益、经营者利益三者统一的利益层次结构,为市场营造公平自由、可预期的竞争法治环境。Three regulation paths of unfair competition behaviors have been formed in China, namely, categorized type, general terms and interests balancing type. Among the existing regulation paths of unfair competition, categorized type is insufficient in legal implication, general terms are abstract and uncertain for applicable results and interests balancing type is able to make up for general terms and uncertainty, but there are risks of recklessness. To optimize the regulation paths of unfair competition behaviors, China should attach importance to legislation, reformation and annulment of the categorized type in order to ensure the tension and advancement of legislation, introduce the analyzing method of competition order damage in order to make up for the uncertainty of general terms and establish a hierarchy of interests that is unified by the competition order, the interests of consumers and the interests of operators in order to create a fair, free and predictable competitive legal environment for the market.

关 键 词：不正当竞争 类型化 一般条款 利益衡量 规制 

分 类 号：D922.294[政治法律—经济法学]