检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:李艳[1] 朱蓉蓉 何畏[4] 潘莉[5] 张贤[1] 任颖[6] Li Yan;Zhu Rongrong;He Wei;Pan Li;Zhang Xian;Ren Ying(Mental Health & Counseling Center,Hefei University of Technology,Hefei 230009,China;Key Laboratory of Mental Health,Institute of Psychology,Chinese Academy of Sciences,Beijing 100101,China;University of Chnese Academy of Sciences,Beijing 100039,China;School of Health Management,Anhui Medical University of Technology,Hefei 230032,China;School of Marxism,Hefei University of Technology,Hefei 230009,China;School of Mathematics,Hefei University of Technology,Hefei 230009,China)
机构地区:[1]合肥工业大学心理健康教育与咨询中心,230009 [2]中国科学院心理研究所心理健康重点实验室,北京100101 [3]中国科学院大学,北京100039 [4]安徽医科大学卫生管理学院,230032 [5]合肥工业大学马克思主义学院,230009 [6]合肥工业大学数学学院,230009
出 处:《中华行为医学与脑科学杂志》2019年第8期746-750,共5页Chinese Journal of Behavioral Medicine and Brain Science
基 金:国家社会科学基金项目(13CKS044).
摘 要:目的探讨大学生完美主义在父母教养方式和反刍思维之间的中介作用.方法采用Nolen-Hoeksema反刍思维量表(ruminative responses scale,RRS)中文版、简式父母教养方式问卷中文版(S-EMBU)、大学生一般完美主义量表对915名大学生团体施测.结果大学生追求高标准、在乎错误、症状反刍、强迫思考、反省深思、反刍思维总分得分分别为[(26. 35±4. 13)分、(17. 14±4. 86)分、(22. 27±4. 64)分、(11. 10±2. 71)分、(10. 38±2. 71)分、( 43. 75±8. 37 )分];大学生反刍思维与父亲/母亲拒绝(r=0. 23、0. 29,P<0. 01)、父亲/母亲过度保护( r=0. 16、0. 20,P<0. 01)、在乎错误( r=0. 36,P<0. 01)显著正相关;大学生反刍思维与父亲/母亲情感温暖显著负相关( r=-0. 07、-0. 09,P<0. 05);在乎错误与父亲/母亲拒绝(r=0. 12、0. 19,P<0. 01)、父亲/母亲过度保护( r=0. 16、0. 12,P<0. 01)显著正相关,与父亲/母亲情感温暖显著负相关(r=-0. 18、-0. 20,P<0. 01).结构方程模型显示,在乎错误在父母拒绝和反刍思维间起部分中介作用(χ2/df=8. 45,RMSEA=0. 09,CFI=0. 96,GFI=0. 97),中介效应值为0. 112(95%CI=0. 048~0. 194),占总效应比例28. 95%.结论在乎错误在父/母亲拒绝与大学生反刍思维间起部分中介作用,减少母亲/父亲拒绝、完美主义,可有效降低大学生反刍思维水平.Objective To explore the mediating effect of perfectionism between rumination and parenting style among undergraduates. Methods The investigation was carried out among 915 college students by random sampling method, using ruminative responses scale(RRS), short-form egma minnenav bardndosna uppforstran(S-EMBU) and college student general perfectionism scale. Results The scores of perfectionism, rumination and their division dimensions in undergraduates were (26.35±4.13),(17.14±4.86),(22.27±4.64),(11.10±2.71),(10.38±2.71)and(43.75±8.37), respectively. Rumination of undergraduates was positively correlated with father rejection, mother rejection(r=0.23, 0.29, P<0.01), father overprotection, mother overprotection(r=0.16, 0.20, P<0.01) and minding mistakes(r=0.36, P<0.01), while negatively correlated with father emotional warmth and mother emotional warmth(r=-0.07,-0.09, P<0.05). Minding mistakes had significantly positive correlations with father rejection, mother rejection(r=0.12, 0.19, P<0.01) and father overprotection, mother overprotection (r=0.16, 0.12, P<0.01). Minding mistakes had significantly negative correlations with father emotional warmth and mother emotional warmth(r=-0.18,-0.20, P<0.01). The structural equation model proved that minding mistakes mediated the relationship between mother and father rejection and rumination through mediating effect test (χ2/df=8.45, RMSEA=0.091, CFI=0.96, GFI=0.97). The mediating effect value was 0.112(95%CI=0.048~0.194), and mediating effect accounted for 28.95%. Conclusion The mediating effect of minding mistakes is remarkable in father and mother rejection and rumination, and reducing father rejection, mother rejection and perfectionism can reduce rumination among undergraduates.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.222