检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:季巍[1] 莫莹[2] 朱耀斌[3] 罗毅[1] Ji Wei;Mo Ying;Zhu Yaobin;Luo Yi(Department of Cardiac Surgery,Children's Hospital,Capital Institute of Pediatrics,Beijing 100020,China;Pediatric Cardiac Center,Bejing Anzhen Hospital,Capital Medical University,Beijing 100029,China;Department of Pediatric Cardiac Surgery,Beijing Children's Hospital,Capital Medical University,Beijing 100045,China)
机构地区:[1]首都儿科研究所附属儿童医院心脏外科,北京100020 [2]首都医科大学附属北京安贞医院小儿心脏中心,100029 [3]首都医科大学附属北京儿童医院小儿心脏外科,100045
出 处:《中国医药》2019年第9期1317-1321,共5页China Medicine
基 金:北京市自然科学基金(7152045);北京市属医院科研培育项目(PG2018022)~~
摘 要:目的系统评价三尖瓣切开(TVD)技术与不切开三尖瓣(non-TVD)两种术式治疗室间隔缺损的疗效和安全性。方法检索1962年2月至2018年2月在PubMed、EMbase、The Cochrane Library、中国知网、中国生物医学文献数据库和万方数据库发表的关于室间隔缺损修补术中应用TVD与non-TVD技术的临床研究,主要观察指标包括体外循环时间、主动脉阻断时间,术后并发症包括残余分流、完全性房室传导阻滞、中重度三尖瓣反流。结果最终纳入9篇非随机对照研究,共4144例患儿,其中TVD组1358例,non-TVD组2786例,膜周部VSD3963例,其他类型VSD181例。Meta分析结果显示,TVD组主动脉阻断时间明显长于non-TVD组(均数差=5.01,95%置信区间:2.38~7.64,P=0.0002),但2组间体外循环时间、残余分流、完全性房室传导阻滞、中重度三尖瓣反流发生率比较差异均无统计学意义(均P>0.05)。结论TVD技术未延长手术时间,且不增加术后并发症发生率。Objective To systematically review the efficacy and safety of tricuspid valve detachment(TVD)versus conventional surgical repair(non-TVD)in the treatment of ventricular septal defect(VSD).Methods Literatures about VSD repair with TVD and non-TVD published between February 1962 and February 2018 were identified using PubMed,Embase,the Cochrane Library,China National Knowledge Infrastructure,Chinese Biomedical Database and Wanfang Data.Cardiopulmonary bypass time,aortic cross-clamping time,postoperative complications including residual defect,complete atrioventricular block and moderate to severe tricuspid regurgitation were analyzed.Results Nine studies involving 4 144 patients in total,1 358 TVD and 2 786 non-TVD,3 963 perimembranous TSD and 181 other types,met the inclusion criteria.Meta analysis demonstrated longer aortic cross-clamping time in TVD patients compared to that in non-TVD patients(mean difference=5.01,95%confidence interval:2.38-7.64,P=0.000 2);no significant differences were observed in cardiopulmonary bypass time,incidences of residual defect,complete atrioventricular block and moderate to severe tricuspid regurgitation(all P>0.05).Conclusion TVD provides equally viable and safe alternative in treating VSD.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:3.14.144.145