MRI检查和CT检查诊断膝关节损伤的临床效果分析  

Clinical analysis of MRI examination and CT examination in the diagnosis of knee joint injury

作　　者：岳庆红 孙晓楠 栾钦花[3] YUE Qinghong;SUN Xiaonan;LUAN Qinhua(Department of CT/MR, Liaocheng Veterans Hospital, Liaocheng 252000, P.R.China;Department of MR, Liaocheng Dongchangfu People’s Hospital, Liaocheng 252000, P.R.China;Shandong Medical Imaging Research Institute Affiliated to Shandong University, Jinan 250021, P.R.China)

机构地区：[1]山东省聊城市复退军人医院CT/MR室,山东聊城252000 [2]山东省聊城市东昌府区人民医院MR室,山东聊城252000 [3]山东大学附属山东省医学影像学研究所,山东济南250021

出　　处：《医学影像学杂志》2019年第8期1399-1401,1406,共4页Journal of Medical Imaging

摘　　要：目的 探讨对比MRI和CT检查诊断膝关节损伤的临床效果。方法 选取膝关节损伤患者40例,均采用CT和MRI对患者的膝关节损伤进行诊断,分析两者的诊断结果和诊断的准确率。结果 对比CT诊断,MRI对隐匿性骨折、少量关节腔积液及韧带损伤检出率高,比较差异(P<0.05),具有统计学意义;MRI诊断准确率为95.0%,CT诊断准确率为80.0%,两组之间比较差异(P<0.05)有统计学意义。结论 MRI对膝关节损伤检查诊断中具有较高的检出率,与CT诊断比较,MRI的诊断效果更好。Objective To compare the clinical effect of MRI and CT in the diagnosis of knee joint injury. Methods 40 patients with knee joint injury were selected, CT and MRI were used to diagnose all patients, and the average divided into two groups, patients in the observation group were treated with MRI in diagnosis of knee joint injury, patients in the control group underwent CT diagnosis, accurate rate of diagnosis and diagnosis results of two groups were compared. Results The diagnostic results of CT compared with MR, the differences between the two groups were ( P <0.05), with statistical significance;the observation accuracy of patients diagnosis was 95% compared with the control group, the diagnostic accuracy rate of 80%, the difference between the two groups was statistically significant ( P <0.05). Conclusion MRI has a higher detection rate in the diagnosis and treatment of knee joint injury. Compared with CT, MRI has a better diagnosis effect.

关 键 词：膝关节损伤 诊断准确率 磁共振成像 体层摄影术 X线计算机 

分 类 号：R681.8[医药卫生—骨科学] R445.2[医药卫生—外科学]