检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:于广益 YU Guang-yi
机构地区:[1]华东政法大学 [2]杭州市人民政府办公厅
出 处:《理论与改革》2019年第5期166-176,共11页Theory and Reform
基 金:国家社会科学基金项目“新型城镇化进程中的权利平衡及其实现途径研究”(项目编号:14BZZ083)的阶段性成果
摘 要:政府信息公开相关的信息获取权、知情权等新兴权利广受社会关注,但相较于信息公开的庞大需求和体量,有关信息公开权利的理论发展和制度实践步调错位,导致信息公开实务当中出现权利损害、冲突、混淆、滥用等一系列问题。应将信息公开置入新兴权利研究视野,观照信息公开权利的理论演进和逻辑变迁,分析权利的侵害与保障、冲突与平衡、扩张与规制等核心命题的内在张力及对行政司法实务的影响,在此语境之下探究信息公开权利理论和制度的建构方向,稳步拓展信息公开权利的疆界。The emerging rights related to government information disclosure, such as the right to obtain information and the right to know, are widely concerned by the society. However, compared with the huge demand and volume of information disclosure, the theoretical development and institu- tional practice of information disclosure rights are misplaced, leading to a series of problems in infor- mation disclosure practice, such as rights damage, conflict, confusion and abuse. Information disclo- sure should be placed in the field of emerging rights research, taking into account the theoretical evolution and logical changes of information disclosure rights, analyzing the inherent tension of core propositions such as infringement and protection of rights, conflict and balance, expansion and regu- lation, and their impact on administrative and judicial practice. In this context, the construction di- rection of information disclosure rights theory and system should be explored, so as to steadily ex- pand the boundaries of information disclosure rights.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.90