检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:何淑靖 曹萌 侯丹丹 He Shujing;Cao Meng;Hou Dandan(College of Physical Education and Sports Science, Qufu Normal University, Qufu Shandong 273165)
机构地区:[1]曲阜师范大学体育科学学院
出 处:《安徽体育科技》2019年第4期47-51,共5页Journal of Anhui Sports Science
摘 要:采用文献资料法、数理统计法、对比分析等研究方法,对雅加达亚运会中日韩奖牌数量的分布特征及不同项群进行实力分析,以期为中国运动健儿们备战2020年东京奥运会提供理论参考。研究发现:中国在体能主导类项群、技能主导类表现难美性项群中具有绝对实力,并且在体能主导类项群田径项目中,表现了良好的发展势头。日本在体能主导类项群中也具有较强实力,游泳项目的优势不断扩大。韩国在技能主导类格斗对抗性项群中占据优势。Using the literature method, mathematical statistics method, comparative analysis and other research methods, the distribution characteristics of the number of medals in China, Japan and Korea in the Asian Games in Jakarta and the strength analysis of different groups are carried out in order to provide theoretical references for Chinese athletes to prepare for the 2020 Tokyo Olympic Games. The study found that China has absolute strength in the performance-oriented group and the leading categories of skills, and it has shown a good momentum in the track and field projects of the physical-oriented group. Japan also has strong strength in the body-oriented category, and the advantages of swimming programs continue to expand. Korea has an advantage in the skill-driven fighting antagonistic group.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.16