检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:朱兵强[1] 孙铭杰 Zhu Bingqiang;Sun Mingjie(Law School,Hunan Normal University,Changsha 410006,Hunan,China)
机构地区:[1]湖南师范大学法学院
出 处:《征信》2019年第8期42-47,共6页Credit Reference
基 金:司法部课题“政府信用惩戒的行政法规制研究”(SFB183004);教育部课题“腐败的信用惩戒法律制度研究”(19YJC820080)
摘 要:政府失信惩戒是指政府及其工作部门因外部行政行为侵犯或损害行政相对人的信赖利益所应当受到的惩罚或承担的责任。当前,政府失信惩戒面临着惩戒规范缺失、惩戒机制不科学、救济机制不完备等问题。为此,需要推进政府信用立法,优化问责机制与完善救济机制等,以促进我国政府失信惩戒的法治化。Punishment for government dishonesty refers to the punishment or responsibility that the government and its working departments should be punished for violating or damaging the trust interests of administrative counterparts due to external administrative acts.At present,such problems are faced with the punishment for government dishonesty as the lack of disciplinary norms,unscientific accountability mechanism and incomplete relief mechanism,etc.Therefore,it is necessary to promote the government credit legislation,optimize the accountability mechanism and improve the relief mechanism,so as to promote the law-based punishment of government dishonesty.
分 类 号:F830.5[经济管理—金融学] D912.1[政治法律—宪法学与行政法学]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.28