检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:王瑞芳 刘光丽 刘安娜 杨金娜 Wang Ruifang;Liu Guangli;Liu Anna;Yang Jinna(Child Healthcare Department,People′s Hospital of Gaoxin District,Weifang,Weifang 261061,China)
机构地区:[1]潍坊市高新区人民医院儿童保健科
出 处:《世界睡眠医学杂志》2019年第8期1101-1102,共2页World Journal of Sleep Medicine
摘 要:目的:研究剥夺睡眠脑电图在小儿复杂部分性癫痫中的诊断价值。方法:选取2017年7月至2018年8月潍坊市高新区人民医院收治的的复杂部分性癫痫患儿80例作为研究的对象,包括男性患儿48例,女性患儿32例。所有患儿分别进行常规脑电图和剥夺睡眠脑电图检查,比较2种诊断方式的效果。结果:常规脑电图检查的阳性率为47. 5%,剥夺睡眠诱导脑电图检查的阳性率为81. 25%。2种方法检查效果比较,差异有统计学意义(χ2=19. 8671,P <0. 05)。结论:与常规脑电图检查比较,在小儿复杂部分性癫痫临床诊断中积极采用采用剥夺睡眠脑电图检查,能够获得较为满意的诊断结果,且该检查手段简单便捷,建议在临床中积极推广使用。Objective: To study the diagnostic value of sleep deprivation EEG in children with complex partial epilepsy. Methods: A total of 80 children with complex partial epilepsy who were admitted to our hospital from July 2017 to August 2018 were enrolled in the study,including 48 males and 32 females.All children underwent routine EEG and deprivation sleep EEG,and the effects of the two diagnostic methods were compared. Results: The positive rate of routine EEG was 47.5%;the positive rate of deprivation of sleep-induced EEG was 81.25%.The difference between the two methods was statistically significant(χ 2=19.8671;P <0.05). Conclusion: Compared with conventional EEG examination,the use of deprivation sleep EEG in the clinical diagnosis of complex partial epilepsy in children can obtain satisfactory results,and the examination method is simple and convenient.It is recommended to actively promote the use in clinical practice.
分 类 号:R338.63[医药卫生—人体生理学] R742.1[医药卫生—基础医学]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.15