我国民法典物权编添附规则立法研究  

A Study on Accretion Rule in Property Volume of China’s Civil Code Legislation

作　　者：陈华彬[1] Chen Huabin

机构地区：[1]中央财经大学法学院

出　　处：《法学杂志》2019年第9期67-78,共12页Law Science Magazine

摘　　要：附合、混合与加工被总称为添附,其涵括动产与不动产的附合及动产与动产的附合、混合、加工。为使因添附结果而相结合的物能发挥整体经济价值与效用,避免因分离而导致物的损耗,我国民法典物权编宜就添附物所有权的归属加以明定,使添附物得以保持其整体性并不致分离。在添附物的所有权因单一化而发生变动后,为调和并维护当事人的利益,应借助债法上的不当得利请求权等而予平衡。我国民法典物权编对于添附规则的厘定及我国添附制度及其规则的法理与学理的构建,应依近现代及当代域(境)外添附制度及其规则的比较立法成例与关于它的共通的法理、学理而为之。The adhesion,mixing and processing are collectively referred to as accretion, which includes the adhesion of real estate and personal property,the adhesion,mixing and processing of personal property and personal property. In order to give full play to the overall economic value and utility of the things combined as a result of accretion and avoid the loss of the things caused by separation,the legislation should clarify the ownership of the accretion things in property volume of China's civil code,so that the accretion things can keep their integrity and not be separated. After the change of the ownership of the accretion things due to the simplification, we should balance it with the claim of unjust enrichment in the law of obligation in order to reconcile and protect the interests of the parties. The redefinition of the accretion rules and the construction of the legal principles and academic theory of the accretion system and its rules in property volume of China's Civil Code should be based on the comparative legislation experience of the accretion system and its rules in modern and present domains and the common legal principles and theory about it.

关 键 词：附合 混合 加工 添附 不当得利请求权 

分 类 号：D923.2[政治法律—民商法学]