我国学术期刊同行评议研究综述  

Overview of peer review of Chinese academic journals

作　　者：付伟棠 FU Weitang(School of Information Management,Nanjing University,163 Xianlin Road,Qixia District,Nanjing 210023,China;Editorial Office of Journal of Library Tribune,Sun Yat -sen Library of Guangdong Province,213 Wenming Road,Yuexiu)District,Guangzhou 510110,China)

机构地区：[1]南京大学信息管理学院 [2]广东省立中山图书馆《图书馆论坛》编辑部

出　　处：《中国科技期刊研究》2019年第8期819-826,共8页Chinese Journal of Scientific and Technical Periodicals

摘　　要：【目的】分析我国学术期刊同行评议发展现状、面对的挑战以及相应的对策,较全面掌握相关研究的成果,以期推动我国学术期刊同行评议的成熟发展。【方法】以中国知网为数据源检索得到学术期刊同行评议文献105篇,再对文献内容进行主题归纳、梳理与分析。【结果】我国开展学术期刊同行评议制度研究的历史较短,发展还不成熟,当前的文献研究表明,学术期刊同行评议尽管作用很大,但在作者、评议专家、编辑和学术环境4个方面都面临挑战,而当前的对策研究主要以改善传统同行评议的流程为主,也有一些探索同行评议新方式的尝试。【结论】尽管学术期刊同行评议面临众多的质疑,但目前来说仍然无法被取代。[Purposes] This article aims to analyze the current situation,challenges,and countermeasures of peer review of academic journals in China,and grasp the results of relevant studies in an all-round way,so as to promote the mature development of peer review of academic journals in China.[Methods]A total of 105 articles on peer-review of academic journals were obtained from CNKI as a data source,and the contents of the literature were summarized,sorted out,and analyzed.[Findings]The research on peer review of academic journals has a short history and immature development in China. Current literature studies show that although peer review plays an important role in academic journals,it faces challenges in four aspects: authors,peer reviewers, editors,and academic environment. Current countermeasures in the literature mainly focus on improving the traditional peer review process,and there are also attempts to explore new ways of peer review .[Conclusions]Although peer review of academic journals faces many doubts,it cannot be replaced at present.

关 键 词：同行评议 学术期刊 学术评价 开放式同行评议 

分 类 号：G237.5[文化科学]