中国英语学习者对前缀和后缀派生词的识别加工差异  被引量:9

A Difference in Processing Prefixed and Suffixed Words by Chinese EFL Learners

在线阅读下载全文

作  者:李俊敏 Marcus Taft[3] 朱正才 张北镇[5] L I Junm in;Marcus TAFT;ZHU Zhengcai;ZHANG Beizhen(School of Foreign Language, Shanghai Jiaotong University, Shanghai 200240, P. R. China;Zhejiang University City College;University of New South Wales;Shanghai Jiaotong University;Jiangsu University)

机构地区:[1]上海交通大学外国语学院,上海市200240 [2]浙江大学城市学院 [3]新南威尔士大学 [4]上海交通大学 [5]江苏大学

出  处:《现代外语》2019年第5期623-635,共13页Modern Foreign Languages

基  金:浙江省哲学社科规划课题“二语学习者对英语屈折词和派生词的识别机制研究”(19NDJC184YB)的阶段性成果

摘  要:本研究考查以汉语为母语的高水平英语学习者对前缀与后缀派生词的识别加工是否存在差异。研究含两个实验,实验一采用前掩蔽启动词汇判断任务,考查前缀派生词对其词根(如disagree-AGREE)的判断是否存在促进作用以及后缀派生词对其词根的启动效应(如sailor-SAIL)是否存在差异,并对比与前后缀相对应的词形相关词对其内镶嵌词(如nuclearCLEAR、pillow-PILL)的启动情况。实验二要求被试对带有前缀或后缀的有词素结构假词(如resuit、printful)和相应的无词素结构假词(如lesuit、printfil)进行词汇判断,比较二者的加工差异。结果表明,高水平英语学习者对于前缀与后缀派生词的识别都存在词素分解过程,前缀比后缀更难识别。前缀加工与英语水平有关,而后缀加工与英语水平无关。This two-experiment study investigates whether the position of the affix in derived words might have different impacts on L2 word recognition. Experiment 1 employed a lexical decision task with masked priming to examine how advanced Chinese learners of English process prefixed and suffixed words during word recognition. Prefixed word primes like disagree were presented to the subjects to see whether their recognition of the transparent stem targets(i. e., AGREE) was facilitated, compared with unrelated primes such as disorder. Non-derived words like nuclear were included to see whether they primed a form-related word embedded at their ends(i.e., CLEAR).Also included were suffixed words like sailor derived from SAIL and form-related words like pillow(with PILL embedded at its front part). Experiment 2 used a simple lexical decision task(i.e.,with no primes) to see how participants reacted to pseudowords with morpheme structure(e. g.,suffix + stem, like printful, and prefix + stem, like resuit) compared to pseudowords without morpheme structure(e.g., printfil and lesuit, where neither-fil nor le-are affixes). It was revealed in both experiments that the advanced EFL learners decomposed suffixed and prefixed words. The processing of prefixed words was found to be harder than the processing of suffixed words, with English proficiency being a mediator.

关 键 词:前缀 后缀 派生词 识别加工 

分 类 号:H319.34[语言文字—英语]

 

参考文献:

正在载入数据...

 

二级参考文献:

正在载入数据...

 

耦合文献:

正在载入数据...

 

引证文献:

正在载入数据...

 

二级引证文献:

正在载入数据...

 

同被引文献:

正在载入数据...

 

相关期刊文献:

正在载入数据...

相关的主题
相关的作者对象
相关的机构对象