检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:贾伟 周建强 徐愿坚 王蕾 凡祖伟 张如意 JIA Wei;ZHOU Jianqiang;XU Yuanjian;WANG Lei;FAN Zuwei;ZHANG Ruyi(Beijing University of Technology,Beijing 100124,China;Beijing E&E Technologies Group Corporation Limited,Beijing 101300,China)
机构地区:[1]北京工业大学,北京100124 [2]北京新源国能科技集团股份有限公司,北京101300
出 处:《环境保护科学》2019年第5期37-42,共6页Environmental Protection Science
基 金:北京市科技计划项目(Z161100001216004)、(Z161100001216009);北京市朝阳区协同创新项目(XC1605);北京市顺义区科技三项费(KS201816)基金资助
摘 要:文章分别采用芬顿法和高锰酸钾氧化法预处理某煤化工企业反渗透浓盐水,研究了不同工艺参数对COD去除效果的影响,对比了两种方法的最优处理效果。结果表明,当H2O2投加量为1.0g/L、FeSO4·7H2O投加量为0.7g/L、水样pH为3.5时,芬顿反应进行2.5h后COD去除率达到最高,为69.8%;当高锰酸钾浓度为1g/L、水样pH为1.5时,高锰酸钾氧化法进行2.5h后COD去除率达到最高,为48.2%。两者比较而言,芬顿法比高锰酸钾法具有更强的氧化性,更适于煤化工行业反渗透浓盐水中COD的去除。Fenton and potassium permanganate oxidation methods were applied as the pre-treatment of reverse osmosis concentrate from coal chemical industry wastewater respectively.The effects of operation conditions on COD removal were studied,and the optimum COD removal rates of these two oxidation methods were compared.The results showed that the COD removal rate of Fenton oxidation method was 69.8% which ranked the highest removal rate when the H 2O 2 concentration was 1.0 g/L, FeSO 4 · 7H 2O concentration was 0.7 g/L,pH was 3.5,the reaction time was 2.5 h. Meanwhile the highest COD removal rate of potassium permanganate oxidation method was 48.2% when the potassium permanganate concentration was 1 g/L,pH was 1.5,the reaction time was 2.5 h. In consequence,the Fenton oxidation method showed a stronger oxidation capability which was more proper for the pre-treatment of reverse osmosis concentrate.
分 类 号:X703[环境科学与工程—环境工程]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.43