论知识产权审判方式改革下审判权综合运行机制的构建——以“三合一”审判模式的刑民并轨为主线  

The Reconstruction of IP Integrated Jurisdiction with the Reform of Trial Modes

作　　者：张璇[1] 覃波[2,3] Zhang Xuan;Qin Bo

机构地区：[1]北京市海淀区人民法院知识产权审判庭 [2]北京市海淀区人民法院刑事审判庭 [3]中国政法大学

出　　处：《电子知识产权》2019年第9期84-95,共12页Electronics Intellectual Property

基　　金：2017年度国家法治与法学理论研究课题“大数据确权与交易的法律制度构造研究”(17SFB3027)

摘　　要：2016 年7 月以来,知识产权“三合一”审判改革在全国法院全面推开,标志着此项改革进入了深化阶段。当前的“三合一”审判改革模式,虽已基本完成了人员和案件等审判管理层面的改革,但刑民关系的深层次融合等实质“合一”仍未实现。由此导致了此类案件的审理,不仅未显现出其与刑事、民事、行政案件分轨审理模式的差异之处,反而在案件审理过程中产生了一系列问题。例如,知识产权刑民案件对同类事实的判断标准相去甚远,合议庭在“是否一并评判刑民责任”以及“适用何种评判标准”等问题上存在选择困惑甚至互相推诿等现象,这些问题尤以知识产权刑事案件为甚。“三合一”审判“形合而实不合”的改革现状,既徒增了各方负担,亦非改革之本意,应当予以正视并有所突破。Since July 2016, the IP integrated jurisdiction reform has been launched aroud the country, which meant this reform on its deepening stage. Although we have almost realized particular developments of IP judicial personnel and case managements, we still do not go into the integration of criminal, administrative and civil IP judicial powers in the essence. That causes many problems, such as a substantial difference in the way of fact findings beween criminal and civil judges. When it comes to whether they can ascertain criminal and civil responsibilities in one case, and which standard they should apply, the memebers of a comprehensive collegiate panel are still in dispute. Hence, the current status in quo is not only at varaince with priniciples of this reform, but also increases burden of each parties involved. By analying practical cases and thinking about feasible improvements, this article intends to make efforts to break through the problems above.

关 键 词：知识产权“三合一”审判 实质合一 机制重建 

分 类 号：D923.4[政治法律—民商法学] D925[政治法律—法学]