法治社会和社会治理:理论定位与关系厘清  

Society under Rule of Law and Social Governance: Theoretical Orientation and Correlative Clarification

作　　者：庞正[1,2] Pang Zheng

机构地区：[1]南京师范大学法学院 [2]中国法治现代化研究院、江苏高校区域法治发展协同创新中心

出　　处：《江海学刊》2019年第5期155-162,255,共9页Jianghai Academic Journal

基　　金：司法部2017年度国家法治与法学理论研究课题“法治社会建设中的网络社群研究”(项目号:17SFB2002)的阶段性成果

摘　　要：法治社会建设和社会治理活动在实践上的确存在很大程度的交集,但法治社会和社会治理作为彼此独立的理论范畴各有不同的分析功能,不可混同使用。法治社会是指一种由国家法律和社会自生规则共同缔造良好秩序的社会状态,以社会组织为主体的社会自治是其存在和运行的基本特征。社会治理范畴描述了一种政府主导、社会参与的公共事务管理方式,在我国目前的社会经济和社会结构条件下,社会治理尚不宜被定位于社会中心主义的实践范式。法治社会和社会治理在研究论域、问题导向、概念功用、实践主体、实践内容上都存在差异,同时在社会结构条件、运行机理、制度依赖、价值取向等方面也具有一致性。To a large extent, an overlap between the realms of social governance and society under the rule of law exists both in theory and practice, whereas these two realms have different functional orientations as independ-ent analysis tools. The society under the rule of law refers to a social state in which a good order is created by national laws and self - generated social rules. The basic feature of its existence and operation is the social au-tonomy with social organizations as the main subject. The category of social governance describes a manage-ment approach which is government - led and society - involved. Under the current social economic and social structural conditions in China, social governance is not suitable for being positioned in a social centralism para-digm. These two concepts have differences in research domain, problem orientation, concept function, prac-tice subject, and practice content. At the same time, there are many consistencies in social structure condi-tions, operational mechanism, institutional dependence, and value orientation between these two concepts.

关 键 词：法治社会 社会治理 基本范畴 理论关系 

分 类 号：D920.0[政治法律—法学] D630