论不同文学史观如何为新文学正名——以《五十年来中国之文学》和《中国新文学的源流》为例  

Research on How Various Literature History Views Rationalize New Literature——Taking Chinese Literature in the Past Fifty Years and The Origin of New Chinese literature as an Example

作　　者：黄一晨 HUANG Yi-chen(Shaanxi Normal University,Xi'an 710119,China)

机构地区：[1]陕西师范大学文学院

出　　处：《内蒙古财经大学学报》2019年第5期74-77,共4页Journal of Inner Mongolia University of Finance and Economics

摘　　要：关于文学史的建构问题,一直是学界的一项重要议题。新文学自面世以来,就引起了来自各方的巨大争论,而新文学的学者们一直致力于为新文学正名。胡适所著《五十年来中国之文学》和周作人所著《中国新文学的源流》都是早期文学史构建过程中的重要书籍,他们用不同的文学史观试图接近文学的真相,以重估文学的方式审视传统文学和新文学,体现出那一代学者们的责任感、使命感。The construct of literature history has always been an important issue within the academic world for a long time.New Chinese literature has also raised fierce debate since its emerging,and scholars in this field have made great efforts to rationalize new literature.For instance, both Chinese Literature in the Past Fifty Years written by Hu Shi and The Origin of New Chinese literature by Zhou Zuoren are the integral works during the early stage of literature history construction.With diverse literature history views to approach the truth of literature,the two writers reviewed traditional literature and new one,representing the responsibility and sense of missions of the scholars in that era.

关 键 词：新文学 文学史观 《五十年来中国之文学》 《中国新文学的源流》 

分 类 号：I206[文学—中国文学]