央地分权下波特假说的再检验——基于中国制造业上市公司数据  

Re-examination of “Potter Hypothesis” under Decentralization: Based on the Data of China’s Listed Manufacturing Industry

作　　者：陈玥光 陶加强[2] CHEN Yueguang;TAO Jiaqiang(Big Data and Risk Administration of Shanghai Municipal Tax Service,State Taxation Administration,Shanghai 200030;Business College,Yancheng Teachers University,Yancheng,Jiangsu 224002)

机构地区：[1]国家税务总局上海市税务局大数据和风险管理局,上海200030 [2]盐城师范学院商学院,江苏盐城224002

出　　处：《扬州大学学报（人文社会科学版）》2019年第5期44-53,共10页Journal of Yangzhou University(Humanities and Social Sciences Edition)

基　　金：国家社会科学基金项目“长江经济带协调性均衡发展研究”(16AJL015)

摘　　要：以往学者在检验“波特假说”时很少区分企业环保技术创新和非环保技术创新,这可能是导致“波特假说”是否成立的结论不一致的主要原因。但是,国内企业由于未统计和公布企业生态创新投入数据,使得对此的检验面临着可行性问题。通过实证分析发现,政府环境规制对企业生态技术投入创新存在显著的正影响,但央地分权会弱化这一正效应。这也从另一个角度验证了“波特假说”在中国的证据,但也发现包括政府分权制度在内的诸多因素会影响“波特假说”成立的可能性。Scholars rarely distinguish environmental innovations and non-environmental innovations when analyzing the Potter hypothesis”,which may be the main reason for the controversy on the Potter Hypothesis”. However,due to the fact that enterprises do not report the data of ecological innovation input,the inspection is facing a problem of feasibility. The empirical analysis shows that the government environmental regulation has a significant positive impact on the innovation of enterprise s eco technology input,but decentralization will weaken this positive effect. This paper verifies the evidence of the Potter Hypothesis in China from another angle,but it also finds out that many factors,like the system of government decentralization,will have a negative effect on Potter Hypothesis”.

关 键 词：环境规制 生态技术创新 央地分权 波特假说 

分 类 号：F773.1[经济管理—产业经济] X32[环境科学与工程—环境工程]