急性期接受经皮冠状动脉介入治疗的心肌梗死患者运动耐量影响因素  被引量:10

Influencing factors of exercise tolerance in patients with myocardial infarction undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention revascularization in acute phase

在线阅读下载全文

作  者:牛亚芊芊 郭丹杰[1] 金宗学 王岚[1] 丁荣晶[1] 张天宏[1] 韩春颖[1] 郭琳[1] Niu Yaqianqian;Guo Danjie;Jin Zongxue;Wang Lan;Ding Rongjing;Zhang Tianhong;Han Chunying;Guo Lin(Heart Center,Peking University People′s Hospital,Beijing100044,China;Department of Cardiology,Affiliated Hospital of Inner Mongolia Medical University,Huhhot 010059,China)

机构地区:[1]北京大学人民医院心脏中心,100044 [2]内蒙古医科大学附属医院心血管内科,呼和浩特010059

出  处:《中华内科杂志》2019年第10期763-769,共7页Chinese Journal of Internal Medicine

摘  要:目的探讨急性期接受经皮冠状动脉介入(percutaneous coronary intervention,PCI)治疗的心肌梗死(myocardial infarction,MI)患者运动耐量的影响因素.方法选取急性期入院并接受PCI治疗的首次MI患者112例,所有患者均于PCI治疗后完成心肺运动试验(cardiopulmonary exercise testing,CPET).依据峰值摄氧量(peak oxygen consumption,VO2 peak)占年龄预计值的百分比(VO2peak%)将患者分为两组,VO2 peak%≥84%者为运动耐量正常组(40例,占35.7%),VO2 peak%<84%者为运动耐量减低组(72例,占64.3%).比较两组患者性别、年龄、体重指数、吸烟史、高血压及糖尿病病史、入院前及接受PCI干预后药物治疗等一般情况;MI类型;肌钙蛋白I(TNI)峰值、MI部位、冠状动脉病变支数及病变类型、血运重建程度、支架数目的差异;进而针对既往存在糖尿病史MI患者的糖尿病发病情况及CPET检查时血糖控制情况进行亚组分析,探讨急性期接受PCI治疗的首次MI患者运动耐量的影响因素.对上述患者进行随访,观察PCI治疗后24个月内主要不良心血管事件(major adverse cardiovascular events,MACE):因胸痛入院、再次血运重建、再梗死以及全因死亡,比较不同运动耐量的PCI治疗后MI患者心脏事件的差异.结果运动耐量减低组患者糖尿病比例明显高于运动耐量正常组(37.5%比17.5%)、超声心动图左心室射血分数(LVEF)值低于运动耐量正常组[(60.6±10.0)%比(65.0±8.2)%],差异均有统计学意义(P值均<0.05).运动耐量减低组C型病变比例明显高于运动耐量正常组(69.4%比42.5%),P<0.05.糖尿病、C型病变是影响运动耐量减低的独立预测因素(糖尿病:OR=3.14,95%CI 1.167~8.362,P=0.023;C型病变:OR=3.32,95%CI 1.444~7.621,P<0.01).接受PCI治疗的MI合并糖尿病患者中,运动耐量减低组糖尿病患病时间明显长于运动耐量正常组[(7.7±3.6)年比(5.0±2.4)年]、空腹血糖达标以及糖化血红蛋白达标比例明显低于运动耐量正常组Objective The aim of the study was to explore the influencing factors of exercise tolerance in patients with myocardial infarction (MI) after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) revascularization in acute state. Methods A total of 112 patients with first MI undergoing PCI revascularization in acute state and completing cardiopulmonary exercise testing (CPET) were enrolled. Exercise capacity was evaluated by peak oxygen consumption percentage (VO2 peak%) in CPET. Patients were divided into normal exercise capacity (NEC) group (n=40) and abnormal (AEC) group (n=72) according to VO2 peak% value. Clinical manifestations, histories of hypertension and diabetes, medications, coronary arterial angiography and echocardiography findings of patients were compared. The onsets of diabetes and blood glucose levels during the period of CPET were evaluated in the MI patients with diabetes. The patients were followed up for major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE)(admission due to chest pain, re?revascularization, re?infarction and all?cause death) within 24 months after PCI. Multivariate logistic regression analyses were conducted to examine influencing factors for exercise tolerance. Results The ratio of diabetes, type C lesions in the AEC group were higher than those in the NEC group (diabetes: 37.5% vs. 17.5%;type C lesions: 69.4% vs. 42.5%, respectively, all P<0.05). The left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) in patients in the AEC group was lower than that in the NEC group [(60.6±10.0)% vs.(65.0±8.2)%, P=0.019]. Multivariate logistic regression analyses showed that history of diabetes and history of type C lesions were the independent risk factors for the declined exercise capacity in the MI patients after PCI revascularization ( OR=3.14, 95%CI 1.167-8.362, P=0.023;OR=3.32, 95%CI 1.444-7.621, P<0.01). Among the MI patients with diabetes, the duration of diabetes in the AEC group was significantly longer than that in the NEC group[(7.7 ± 3.6)years vs.(5.0 ± 2.4)years] and the proportions of subjects reaching t

关 键 词:心肌梗死 血运重建 心肺运动试验 运动耐量 心脏康复 

分 类 号:R542.22[医药卫生—心血管疾病]

 

参考文献:

正在载入数据...

 

二级参考文献:

正在载入数据...

 

耦合文献:

正在载入数据...

 

引证文献:

正在载入数据...

 

二级引证文献:

正在载入数据...

 

同被引文献:

正在载入数据...

 

相关期刊文献:

正在载入数据...

相关的主题
相关的作者对象
相关的机构对象