引导打击与近距空中支援作战分析  

Study of Direct Action and Close Air Support

作　　者：刘纯 刘洁[3] 吴静青 吴家锋 王世尧 LIU Chun;LIU Jie;WU Jing-qing;WU Jia-feng;WANG Shi-yao(The 650 Aircraft Design Institute of AVIC Hongdu, Nanchang 330024,China;Fudan University, Shanghai 200433,China;War Research Institute,Academy of Military Sciences, Beijing 100850,China;North Auiomatic Control Technology Institute, Taiyuan 030006,China)

机构地区：[1]航空工业洪都650飞机设计研究所,南昌330024 [2]复旦大学,上海200433 [3]军事科学院战争研究院,北京100850 [4]北方自动控制技术研究所,太原030006

出　　处：《火力与指挥控制》2019年第9期7-12,17,共7页Fire Control & Command Control

基　　金：空军“十三五”背景基金资助项目(10305)

摘　　要：由于火力引导打击与近距空中支援在末端作战流程上极其相似,都是由占位部署、目标侦察、目标定位、上报目标信息、引导飞机(火力)、实施打击、评估、退出等步骤组成,造成相关研究人员在概念上将火力引导打击与近距空中支援相互混淆,为消除理解上的差异,明晰二者的区别,从作战概念、样式、流程等角度,对引导打击与近距空中支援进行比较研究,分析出二者在末端控制、人员要求、作战目的等方面均有本质区别,是两种相互独立的作战样式,无相互包含和繁简关系。As the operational process of Direct Action(DA) and Close Air Support(CAS)are extremely similar, including Deployment of troops, target detection, target orientation, guiding,attack,assessment and withdrawal from the action,many CAS researchers are confused by the concept of DA and CAS combat mode. In order to help the related researchers clear the difference of DA and CAS,DA and CAS from the perspective of operation concept,operation mode,operational process,etc are studied comparatively. A conclusion drawn is that the CAS and DA are two different operation,the terminal control type, personnel requirement, the purpose of action are totally different, no relationship of subordination.

关 键 词：火力引导打击 近距空中支援 特种作战 作战分析 

分 类 号：E08[军事—军事理论]