专利侵权惩罚性赔偿问题研究  

Research on Punitive Compensation for Patent Infringement

作　　者：张武军[1] 张唯玮 Zhang Wujun;Zhang Weiwei(School of Humanities and Social Science, University of Science and Technology, Beijing 100083, China)

机构地区：[1]北京科技大学文法学院

出　　处：《科技进步与对策》2019年第20期121-127,共7页Science & Technology Progress and Policy

基　　金：中央高校基本科研业务费专项基金项目(FRF-BR-17-006B)

摘　　要：我国《专利法》规定了4种专利损害赔偿方式,司法解释对此也进行了细化。但总体而言,对专利损害赔偿的规定较为原则,实际操作中存在许多难以解决的问题,如赔偿数额低、诉讼时间长、举证困难等,难以遏制故意侵权和多次侵权,有必要引入惩罚性赔偿制度。最新的《专利法修订草案》第六十八条规定故意侵犯他人专利权处以一倍以上三倍以下赔偿数额。但是,对于什么情况下是“故意”、一倍以上三倍以下赔偿数额如何确定等还没有具体规定,缺乏可操作性。阐述专利侵权损害赔偿概念及计算方法,比较美国、日本、中国台湾地区专利惩罚性赔偿制度对我国的启示,分析我国专利侵权损害赔偿制度及存在的问题,并提出相关政策建议。In the past, compensation for intellectual property damage in our country mainly adopted the principle of "filling in the plain" to compensate the actual loss of the oblige. But at present, there are some problems in patent infringement compensation cases in our country, such as low compensation for damages and high cost of safeguarding rights, which are not enough to curb malicious infringement and repeated infringement. At present, this system is clearly introduced into the Patent Law in the latest Draft Amendment to the Patent Law, but there are still some key problems. In this paper, the author discusses the necessity and feasibility of introducing the punitive damages system into the infringement part of patent law in China by studying and analyzing the punitive damages system of foreign patent law and its own characteristics. Finally, the author summarizes the problems encountered in the process of constructing this system and puts forward suggestions and suggestions based on these problems.

关 键 词：专利侵权 专利惩罚性赔偿 适用条件 故意侵权 三倍赔偿金 

分 类 号：DF523.2[政治法律—民商法学]