“封建+X”系列术语问题的语言学分析  

Linguistic Analysis of the Terms as “Feudal+X”

作　　者：张宜民 ZHANG Yimin(Department of History,Anhui University,Hefei 230039 ,China;School of Foreign Languages,Anhui Agricultural University,Hefei 230036,China)

机构地区：[1]安徽大学历史系 [2]安徽农业大学外国语学院

出　　处：《湖北文理学院学报》2019年第10期58-61,共4页Journal of Hubei University of Arts and Science

基　　金：合肥市2015年度社科规划课题

摘　　要：规范术语是社会科学学科建设当中的重要内容。史学术语的研究未能受到学界应有的重视,当下中国历史学科的史学术语规范工作亟待改进。文章以术语“封建”的异化现象为例来说明史学术语不够科学规范的问题。研究方法是,首先依据权威词典查明相关词意,其次用结构语言学的横组合纵聚合理论来分析一些术语的内在矛盾,证明某些术语不能成立,再次从语用学角度分析“封建”畸变的主要原因,最后根据科学术语命名的基本原则质疑“封建+X”系列术语的可靠性,引发人们对于中国史学术语规范化问题的再关注与再思考。Normative terminology is an important part of the discipline construction of social science. The study of historical terminology has not been paid enough attention by the academic circles. Nowadays, the standardization of historical terminology in the discipline of Chinese history needs to be improved urgently. Taking the alienation phenomenon of the term “feudalism” as an example, this paper illustrates the problem that some historical terms are not scientific and normative enough. The research method is to find out the meanings of related words according to authoritative dictionaries, then to analyze the internal contradictions of some terms with the theory of paradigmatic relations and syntamatic relations of structural linguistics, proving that some terms can not be established, and then to analyze the main causes of the distortion of the term “feudal” from the perspective of pragmatics. Finally, according to the basic principles of scientific terminology naming, the reliability of “feudal + X ” terms were questioned. We should pay more attention to and rethink the standardization of Chinese historiography terminology.

关 键 词：史学术语规范化 "封建+X"术语缺陷 语言学分析 术语革新 

分 类 号：H030[语言文字—语言学]