检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:李飞 LI Fei
机构地区:[1]河南师范大学法学院 [2]华中科技大学法学院
出 处:《城市规划》2019年第10期61-66,共6页City Planning Review
摘 要:刑法与城乡规划法需要在城市生活时代紧密衔接起来,以有效应对规划犯罪行为.但是,对于规划法益的保护,我国既没有真正的行政刑法,刑法也始终没有分化出对其的独立对应性罪名.从法益保护立场出发,我国城乡规划的法益格局已经发生变动,现有刑法的一般罪名和非对称性罪名并不能有效评价和惩罚规划法益侵害.刑法机能不仅需要完善规划犯罪案例指导,而且有必要进行刑事立法修订.在进行规划犯罪的刑事立法修订时,应当同时考虑设定独立的规划罪名,以及借助相关既定罪名实现规划犯罪治理.The Criminal Law and the Urban and Rural Planning Law need to be closely connected in the era of urban life in order to effectively deal with planning crimes. However, regarding the protection of legal interests of planning, there is neither administrative criminal law in a real sense, nor independent charges corresponding to it as defined by the Criminal Law. From the standpoint of protection of legal interests, the pattern of planning legal interests in China has changed, and the general and asymmetrical charges of the existing Criminal Law cannot effectively evaluate and punish the infringement of planning legal interests. The Criminal Law should not only improve the case guidance over planning crimes, but also revise the criminal legislation, which should consider not only setting up independent charges of planning crimes but also achieving the control over planning crimes by using related established charges.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:18.218.146.21